Piracy Thought
Thank you to everyone who commented and e-mailed about my ASD post on Friday. I tried to keep up and respond to everything, but there was just no way. I read and appreciated them all.
#
So on Saturday, Google Alerts brought up an individual who had reposted my entire First Novel Survey on his blog. Then on Sunday, someone posted a heads up link to an e-book “lending” site.
I’m not a rabid pirate-hunter, nor am I terribly fond of or impressed by DRM. That said, I spent a month working on that survey, doing the research, writing it all up, putting the graphs and graphics together.
I’ve also sold reprint rights for that article. I.e., as a professional writer, this is one of my sources of income. Not a major one, but that reprint sale will pay for a week’s worth of groceries for my family.
If you want to link back to it, great. Quote a snippet, no problem. But to copy and post the whole thing without permission? Illegality aside, that’s a dick move. An unintentional one, perhaps. Sometimes this sort of thing happens from ignorance or cluelessness. But still highly annoying to the writer who did the actual work.
I’m willing to give the benefit of the doubt to the blogger. Not so with the e-book “library.” Our so-called librarian even begs for donations on the site, because you see, he has bills to pay. He goes on to explain that since he (allegedly) bought these e-books, “[the] authors and thieving publishers have received their due.”
This makes me cranky, in part because I’ve been busting my ass even more than usual this month. I’ve written, revised, and submitted a 4000-word short story, a 2000-word sample chapter for a possible novel deal, and continued to work on Snow Queen.
My “thieving” publisher will read my work, write up editing notes, pay for the book to be copy-edited, typeset, and sent to me for final proofing. This is before their sales force heads out to do their thing, before the hire a professional cover artist, and before the publicist starts working to build word of mouth.
You can argue that obscurity is a greater threat than piracy, and you might be right. You can argue that piracy doesn’t actually cost writers sales, that people who download these files probably wouldn’t have paid for the book anyway. That this could be good for writers, because it can be a way to get new readers.
All of that might be true. But when that “help” comes from someone who calls authors/publishers thieves for the crime of wanting to be paid for our work? Someone who at the same time begs for donations to pay his own bills? I’m perfectly happy to build my career without that kind of help, thank you.
Stephen Watkins
May 17, 2010 @ 10:17 am
Amen.
JureF
May 17, 2010 @ 10:35 am
I agree all the way. Your survey is what brought me to this blog (it was linked from somewhere, possibly Laughing Squid or BoingBoing), and (as someone who writes for a magazine) I realize the importance of giving credit where credit is due.
I hope it raises your spirits to hear that your survey introduced me to your blog, which has in turn led me to add your Goblin trilogy to my Amazon wish list (which more like my to-buy list) 😉
Steve
May 17, 2010 @ 11:12 am
Indeed, JureF could almost have written my comment as well: That survey is what brought me here, where I’ve been proud to join your RAINN campaign, as well as purchase The Stepsister Scheme and pre-order Red Hood’s Revenge. (The Mermaid’s Madness is simply awaiting my next trip to Borders.)
Being a blogger myself, I can appreciate your anger at site scrapers. Since I no longer write about World of Warcraft, I’m not subjected to that very much anymore, but it still rankles.
zollmaniac
May 17, 2010 @ 12:17 pm
Same here!
The survey brought me here and I enjoyed the blog posts and sample chapters so much I became a rabid – I mean avid – follower.
Jim C. Hines
May 17, 2010 @ 12:34 pm
Thanks, Jure. (I’m guessing Boing Boing.) It does help 🙂
Jim C. Hines
May 17, 2010 @ 12:35 pm
Oh, cool — I hadn’t realized it was the survey that first brought you here. Thanks!
Jim C. Hines
May 17, 2010 @ 12:35 pm
Thanks, Steve. Site scrapers, eh? I haven’t heard the term before, but I like it.
Ken Marable
May 17, 2010 @ 12:49 pm
How dare those thieving publishers try to run a business and make money!
Down with capitalism! Up with anarchy!
*sigh* That e-library just goes to show that regardless of all debates of whether it is lost sales, free advertising, DRM pains, corporate driven copyright law, blah blah blah – it ultimately comes down to someone being a jerk. Posting all those free ebooks is being a jerk. Taking donations is just the icing on the cake. A cake made of dog poo.
Being a jerk doesn’t change laws. Being a jerk just, well, makes you a jerk.
Steven Saus
May 17, 2010 @ 2:49 pm
After my comment exchange with the blogger… I think you’re giving them waaaaay too much credit. I think they knew exactly what they’re doing, but don’t care. They’ve justified thier selfishness, and wrapped themselves in a copyfighter flag (which annoys me to no end, as it gives copyfighters a bad name).
For any of you other folks who might care to see a few snippets of that exchange (or some of the arguments the blogger tried to use), it’s the link for my name above.
Steve Buchheit
May 17, 2010 @ 3:15 pm
As a former pirate (long since reformed), kids these days just don’t know WTF they’re doing. It’s one thing to be a pirate, it’s another to be a stupid jerk. Asking for “donations” or pay is just begging for the loving mallet of correction to be used, as in “The court finds the defendant guilty (gavel sound)”. And ripping of what is easy (copy/pasting from blogs other than your own) is the epitome of sloth.
Seriously, dudes, we had to hack. The glory of the hack was ours, the program still belonged to others.
JureF
May 17, 2010 @ 3:15 pm
Steven, I’ve just read through your post regarding your email exchange with the blogger – very well written and informative. I smiled at your use of whuffie, and was surprised that there’s actually a Wikipedia article on the subject (having read Doctorow’s Down and Out in the Magic Kingdom just recently). I’d like to point out that while the blogger doesn’t get any financial rewards out of coping Jim’s post right now, he could easily at some point in the future. Any and all traffic is welcome down the line, if you ever decide to try and monetize it.
Though it seems some good will come of all this – Jim’s already found a few new fans 😉
Stephen Watkins
May 17, 2010 @ 3:59 pm
FYI, the survey brought me here, too. I think I saw it mentioned either on Charlie Stross’ blog or Tobias Buckell’s blog.
Chris
May 17, 2010 @ 6:19 pm
Another Amen to that, Jim.
Steven Saus
May 17, 2010 @ 8:50 pm
@JureF – Thanks for the kind words. Honestly, folks like that anonymous blogger (and really, an anonymous blogger who requires comments to not be anonymous?) give those of us who do support Creative Commons a bad name.