The “Imaginary” Backlash Against the New Doctor
By now, I imagine most of my fellow geeks are aware that when Peter Capaldi leaves Doctor Who in the coming Christmas special, he’ll be replaced by Jodie Whittaker. Naturally, not everyone was happy about the next Doctor being…gasp…a woman.
As the conversation progressed, I started to see more people suggesting the backlash wasn’t a thing. All they were seeing was people complaining about the backlash, as opposed to anyone actually being unhappy about a woman playing the Doctor. The whole thing was people getting angry over nothing, and feeding on each other’s anger.
Now Steven Moffat himself has joined in to proclaim, “There has been so many press articles about a backlash among the Doctor Who fandom about casting a female Doctor. There has been no backlash at all. The story of the moment is that the notionally conservative Doctor Who fandom has utterly embraced that change completely.”
Oddly, most of the people I’ve seen saying the backlash is imaginary, made-up, and/or blown completely out of proportion, have been men. Perhaps — and I’m just guessing here — because it’s easier for men to overlook sexism? Misogyny doesn’t directly affect us, so we’re less likely to notice it?
It’s like white people denying racism, straight people denying the hatred and intolerance of homosexuality, and so on. Just because we don’t see it — perhaps because we choose not to look, or perhaps because we’ve never learned to look — doesn’t mean it isn’t real.
For all those who share Moffat’s confusion, here are just a few examples of the ignorant, sexist, hateful, and sometimes flat-out batshit responses to Whittaker taking over as the Doctor.
#
“The replacement of male with female is meant to erase femininity. In point of fact, and no matter what anyone thinks or wishes, readers and viewers have a different emotional relationship to female characters as male. This does not mean, obviously, that females cannot be protagonists or cannot be leaders. It means mothers cannot be fathers and queens cannot be kings.
“…I have been a fan of Dr Who since age seven, when Tom Baker was the Doctor. I have tolerated years of public service announcements in favor of sexual deviance that pepper the show. But this is too much to tolerate.
“The BBC has finally done what The Master, the Daleks and the Cybermen have failed to do. They killed off the Doctor.”
–John C. Wright (you may remember him from his freak-out over Korra and Asami.)
#
Over on Twitter, @TechnicallyRon took comments from angry Doctor Who “fans” and turned them into title cards.
Lisa Crowther also screenshotted some comments from angry Daily Mail readers.
#
Twitter also has plenty of comments like this fellow’s woeful lament, “And again the PC brigade get their way. R.I.P Doctor Who” (Source)
#
Joe Scaramanga’s response to this sexist twit was a thing of beauty.
#
British tabloid and shit-filled dumpster fire The Sun responded to the announcement by publishing nude photos of Judie Whittaker.
#
Caitlynn Fairbarns has rounded up a ton of the negative comments and reactions.
#
But remember everyone, it’s not about sexism!
“It’s a woman. That’s it, Doctor Who is ruined. Like I said, I’m not sexist, I just don’t think it’s a good idea.” –Mark S.W.
#
Now, folks might argue that the majority of Doctor Who fans are excited about the Doctor being a woman. (Though there’s a very real and valid frustration that we’re on our fourteenth doctor and the character has still been exclusively white.) Others will say some of the negative comments are coming from trolls just looking to get a reaction, or that of course Daily Mail readers are being horrid about Whittaker’s casting.
You might be right. That doesn’t change the fact that the negativity exists. It’s not one or two isolated assholes. It’s a real and significant thing, and it’s closely tied to the kind of harassment and disdain and hatred and other forms of sexism women deal with every day. Sexism that men so often don’t see. Sexism we respond to by telling women they’re overreacting, or they’re just imagining things, or that if they’d just stop talking about it the problem would somehow magically go away.
I get it. You’re tired of hearing people complain about sexism. Gosh, can you imagine how tiring it must be when you’re constantly on the receiving end of that sexism. Constantly being told you shouldn’t be allowed to play the same kinds of roles. Constantly being told your only worth comes from your body. Constantly being told your inclusion is some kind of public service announcement. Constantly having your accomplishments belittled as “PC pandering.”
Look, I wish we didn’t have folks like Wright rolling around with his head up his ass every time his Straight White Manliness feels threatened by a cartoon or a TV show or whatever else he’s scared of this week, but we do. Pretending otherwise not only turns a blind eye to the pervasiveness of sexism and other forms of bigotry, it also means turning your back on those who are directly targeted by that intolerance every day.
Kristin
July 25, 2017 @ 3:35 pm
I’d like to see a disabled Doctor – maybe missing a limb, maybe limping/walking with a cane. Maybe regeneration isn’t always perfect, and the Doctor starts to stand, falls, and says Well! Going to have to figure out how to do this!
Klimpaloon
July 25, 2017 @ 4:40 pm
A tiny part of me dies a little whenever I see the angry reaction as one of the top three Facebook reactions on any and all articles talking about the new Doctor.
Sally
July 25, 2017 @ 5:42 pm
I’d thought we were going to get a black male Doctor this time around, as has been rumored before. But am thrilled to get a woman.
@Kristin: A cane makes a great weapon that people and aliens don’t expect. Also, “sonic cane”, anyone?
Kath Duguid
July 25, 2017 @ 5:53 pm
The reaction I’ve had from Dr Who fans (male and female) whom I’ve asked in person about the new Doctor has been overwhelmingly positive: they say there is nothing in canon to suggest the doctor can’t be a woman and several teasers over the years to suggest that he could regenerate into a she. They are looking forward in a non-judgemental way to see what the new doctor will make of the role and hoping the writing will improve. The only negative reaction I’ve heard has come from a woman who isn’t particularly a fan and thinks that the BBC are jumping on a politically correct bandwagon.
There has been a vocal back lash, but I’m not aware of it being a large backlash. I’m English, so maybe our demographics are different?
About a disabled Dr, surely he has been blind for some of the last series? I would call that a disability.
Cormac curran
July 25, 2017 @ 6:27 pm
Jesus what’s wrong with you people no one is allowed negitive opinions about doctor who .bbc spin they say there’s 80 per cent for the Doctor been female and 20 per cent against .thats just bbc spin there controlling the poll shame on you bbc.theres one thing the women actress is not going to do and that Ian Flemings James Bond .bond is male period .
Jim C. Hines
July 25, 2017 @ 6:44 pm
Cormac – Please show me anywhere in the post or comments here that anyone said people aren’t allowed to have negative opinions. Personally, I’m going to point out and mock these sexist garbage opinions, but you have every right to cling to them.
If, on the other hand, you’re whining because you can’t express sexist crap without people pointing out that you’re expressing sexist crap? Well, yeah.
Out of curiosity, do you have any evidence whatsoever that the BBC is manipulating their poll results? Or is that just more making shit up, like your silly assertion that nobody’s allowed to have negative opinions?
Cormac curran
July 25, 2017 @ 7:01 pm
Why attack me for my opinion .i am entitled to my opinion .just because I wanted doctor who to be male what’s wrong with that .doctor who has been male for long time that’s why I find change hard .i did not mean to say that about bbc and the doctor who poll but I just thought the poll would be abut more even .and by the way I am not sextist I am just annoyed doctor who fan.cormac
Jim C. Hines
July 25, 2017 @ 7:10 pm
Yes, you are entitled to your opinion. I just said that in the previous comment. Not sure why you feel the need to repeat it.
Change is hard. That’s…actually, that’s something I can sympathize with a little. I have trouble with change sometimes too. But the solution isn’t to stop things from changing.
The Doctor has been male for a long time, yes. Why do you think that is? There’s no reason in the show’s canon to say the Doctor can’t be a woman, and there are multiple canonical references explaining that Time Lords aren’t restricted by race or gender when they regenerate. So what possible reason is there to avoid letting a woman play the Doctor? (Or a nonwhite actor, for that matter.)
“I am not sexist I am just annoyed doctor who fan.”
And why are you annoyed? Because the Doctor changed? That happens every few years. Did you react the same way every time a new actor took over the role? Or is your problem not with the Doctor changing, but with this *particular* change? None of your comments have said anything about the new actor; your only complaint is with that actor’s gender.
And yeah, that’s sexist. That doesn’t mean you’re a terrible person. But maybe take a deeper look at where your annoyance is really coming from?
Cormac curran
July 25, 2017 @ 7:29 pm
I am not a terrible person.and I say again I am not sextist .why keep on saying i am sextist just because I wanted a male doctor .you seem to be very mean with your words .i was bullied in my young life so I don’t think your been very nice with your comments .what I don’t like when you send emails or comments to any forum website they get nasty with you .if your intention is to put down a person because of there options that’s just not nice.please just don’t send any message back if it’s not good.cormac
Jim C. Hines
July 25, 2017 @ 7:46 pm
Cormac – If you don’t want people to think of you as sexist, perhaps you should stop saying sexist things. Better yet, perhaps you could examine why you’re saying sexist things.
Instead of addressing any of the questions in my previous comment, you’re simply complaining that I’m not being nice. I wonder if that could relate in any way to the fact that your very first comment started out, “Jesus what’s wrong with you people…”
If you want people to treat you more kindly, maybe avoid coming onto strangers’ blogs and leaving nasty comments. It might help.
As for your last sentence there, you don’t get to dictate whether or not I or anyone else responds to your comment on my website.
Nothing in this comment is meant to bully or insult you. It *is* meant to challenge your arguments. If you can’t handle that, this probably isn’t the right blog for you to be commenting on.
Chris Lochner
July 25, 2017 @ 8:20 pm
Now, are you really any different than the people you’re attacking? Resistance to a female Doctor is sexism but placing the new Doctor as female( was there competition with the best player selected?), that’s not? Maybe she will be good maybe not but when people are much more excited about the makeup of the player and not the storyline , does it really matter? BTW Missy was a brilliant Master.
Lenora Rose
July 25, 2017 @ 8:35 pm
Was there a competition with the best selected when Capaldi took over? Or Matt Smith? If there wasn’t, and you said nothing then, then saying there should have been one when the showrunners chose Whittaker is… you guessed it. Sexist.
Jim C. Hines
July 25, 2017 @ 8:41 pm
Thank you, Lenora.
Yep. When a man is chosen for a role, that’s just the natural order of things. But when a woman gets a role, suddenly everyone’s so worried about whether it *really* went to the best actor. Weird, huh?
Grumpy wolf
July 25, 2017 @ 9:15 pm
Typical feminist rag making up stuff, all I have to say is Ghostbusters 2016 and current marvel comics sale. Cya in a year when the ratings are in the garbage and the show is on the verge on cancellation. Facts show that people don’t like it when you mess with an established charector, especially one of 50 years.
Jim C. Hines
July 25, 2017 @ 9:31 pm
“Typical feminist rag making up stuff…”
I’m curious what exactly is “made-up” here. Also curious who sent the trolls over…
Kristin
July 25, 2017 @ 9:59 pm
Waiting for the choosing wardrobe scene when new Doctor screams “is it too much to ask for some decent POCKETS?!?”
mjkl
July 25, 2017 @ 10:09 pm
@Grumpy wolf: “Facts show that people don’t like it when you mess with an established charector, especially one of 50 years.”
An established character who’s been played as regenerating 13 different times so far? by actors who (other than being white males) don’t look or sound like each other?
Adam-Troy Castro
July 25, 2017 @ 10:25 pm
I simply love how a certain species of twit can deny their reaction is sexist while displaying that sexism in those very responses.
I note that our times have given us Harry Potter fans who are bullies, Star Trek fans who are against diversity, and now Doctor Who fans who are against kindness and change. Have none of you ever paid attention?
Carpe Librarium
July 25, 2017 @ 11:42 pm
I’m more disappointed that *so much* focus has been on the negative responses.
I perfomed a very lazy and scientifically debatable bit of research by looking at the various reaction responses to the official announcement on the Doctor Who Facebook page.
Currently 193,000 reactions
163,000 positive (like/love)
21,000 neutral (wow – as I can’t tell if those are happy or horrified)
7,000 (3.6%) are angry/sad.
Yes, people are being chauvinistic nincompoops and hating on the casting decision, they also seem to be trumpeting their opinions prolifically in various comment sections across news and social media.
I just wish headlines and articles had put it into perspective a little more.
E.g.
“Fans enthusiastic with new Doctor Who!”
Paragraph: Capaldi leaving
Paragraph: the wait is over after months of speculation
Paragraph: Jodie Whittaker announced
Paragraph: You might know her from such roles as…
Paragraph: Overwhelmingly positive reaction from fans (10 example tweets, which seems to be a Thing Journalists Do now)
Paragraph: Puny minority of sexist crybabies shouting on twitter (2 example tweets)
Paragraph: Chibnall/Capaldi/Gomez/Piper/Davies/Moffat etc etc thrilled
Paragraph: JODIE MOTHERFLIPPIN’ WHITTAKER! The wait is on until the Christmas special.
Mostly, I just wish the naysayers hadn’t been rewarded with so much coverage, giving the false impression that their opinion is the majority, or that it’s an even split between positive and negative reactions.
Lee
July 25, 2017 @ 11:45 pm
WRT the people who are upset that the Doctor is still not a PoC… I get that. However, I will also point out that the usual course of change in this sort of thing (both in the media and in real life) is all-white-men to some-black-men to some-women. I’m not going to complain about women, just once, moving from last place to second in that sequence.
antiqueight
July 26, 2017 @ 4:32 am
There was a review of the numbers early on : on brandwatch “react-doctor-who-13” – over 500,000 comments reviewed. 20% negative- that’s 100,000….
Cormac curran
July 26, 2017 @ 6:18 am
Hello mr Hines today are family is very upset .why because my brother last night harmed himself after your messages to him.he is vunerebal and chould not take the way you were calling him sextist all the time.but thank god he got out of hospital .the doctor said we have to keep an eye on him.people who are vunerebal should not be treated like this .from john curran ,Cormac’s brother
Jim C. Hines
July 26, 2017 @ 8:44 am
John – I find it odd that your comment has the exact same misspellings, lack of capitalization, and writing style as Cormac’s. I see two possibilities here.
1. Your brother harmed himself after being told his comments were sexist. He was hospitalized, treated, and released, and eleven hours later you took it upon yourself to come back and comment. And you just happen to have an identical writing style to your brother. I’m not saying this isn’t the case, and if so, I’m glad your brother got treated for his injuries. I’m also concerned that they sent him home so quickly when he’s obviously quite vulnerable and fragile. That seems both odd and unwise.
2. This is a poor attempt to avoid any accountability for your own comments and to try to guilt trip me for calling you on your sexism.
In either case, it’s clear Cormac is very troubled, and needs help. Do you really think continuing to comment and converse here is the best idea?
Angua
July 26, 2017 @ 8:22 pm
I’m pretty impressed that your blog post on “yeah, well, the backlash is real” managed to prove its point so decisively in the comments.
MadGastronomer
July 26, 2017 @ 10:56 pm
Angua, Lewis’s Law in action. The comments on any article on feminism justify feminism.
Celestine Nox
July 28, 2017 @ 11:02 am
Formal is probably about 12 years old. No older than 18–that’s the kind of passive-aggressive guilt-tripping a child would do. As sexist and abusive as a lot of grown men can be on the Internet, I haven’t seen a whole lot of them claim to have hurt themselves because of so-called online bullying.
It’s also really funny that on a blog post about people ignoring the sexist negative reactions to Whitaker’s casting, the trolls really came out to play and roll around in the sexism.
Keep up the good work, Jim.
Celestine Nox
July 28, 2017 @ 11:03 am
Ah that was supposed to be “Cormac,” not formal. Stupid autocorrect.
KatG
July 29, 2017 @ 8:34 pm
The first stories about her appointment were about how great it was that a woman had been cast finally, instead of banned from consideration, and talked about who she was and her Broadchurch connection to the new Doctor Who showrunner. The second wave of stories was about the completely real backlash and every single one of those stories contained the tweets and social media quotes from people actually complaining — complete and total evidence that it was sadly going on. Even worse, amid the third wave of coverage — which was mainly about the new Doctor again and speculation about what the show was going to be doing in the new season and who the new companions, if not Bill, might be, was the publication of the photos by an actual newspaper publication meant to add to the backlash by Murdoch’s people doing their usual nastiness.
I understand that Moffat was trying to “help” by not wanting it seen/presented by the media as the audience deserting the show over a woman when nothing of that sort is occurring. But the fact that 99% of the fandom supports the news does not change what Whittaker herself is having to go through out in the world just to play the role. That Moffat tried to indicate that she isn’t dealing with that, that it barely or didn’t exist, is reprehensible. Much as we love Matt Smith, Moffat could have chosen a white woman or an actor of color for the Doctor then and did not. As far as I know, they didn’t even let them audition. Maybe the BBC would not let him, as they refused in 1986 when the show wanted to cast a woman Doctor. So for him to pretend that this has not been an obstacle at the show up till now is him trying to hide the very institutionalized sexism at the BBC, the show and Western society in general, as well as perhaps his own.
Which, and this is the hard thing to make so many people understand, is a strategy that supports sexism and racism, not changes them. Hiding racism and sexism, ignoring the struggles people impacted by it go through and not offering a counter view that pushes for change, helps validate it and allows it to operate without any chance of change. It leaves the people out there dealing with it — like Whittaker — hanging out to dry. When you’ve finally changed decades of sexism by making your shape-shifting alien something other than a white male human, it is a big deal, and when you’re asking your new star to not only take on that change, but to risk her life playing the role from it, you can at least have some media coverage of that risk. And you can at least acknowledge when some of that media attacks the show and the person now playing the role.
My daughter stopped watching Doctor Who because she didn’t like a lot of what Moffat was doing in running it, much as she loved Matt Smith, Karen Gillian, etc. I stuck it out and enjoyed Capaldi, but I can see what she meant — Moffat appears to be continually clueless. She is interested in starting to watch again, and was interested in Bill, and of course is happy about the new casting. Let’s hope it marks a bit of a sea change for the clueless white men running the machine as well.
Eleanor Stokes
August 1, 2017 @ 12:04 pm
I would like to make a quick note here about “not being sexist”.
If your ONLY issue with the Doctor change is that she is a woman, then yes your opinion is sexist. Your opinion is based on a veiw about her sex. If your opinion about a PoC being cast is based solely on the color of thier skin, then that is in fact racist.
I think part of the issue here is that some people who look at the dissenters are looking at thier comments in the wrong way. I am sure Moffet learned a long long time ago to filter out the baseless outrage at any change he makes. Mainly because he makes a lot of rage inducing changes. He most likely bunches all of those types of responses in with the “baseless outrage at change” category.
I have heard a few people say “It isn’t sexist because it is about the quality of the show”. If someone can honestly give me good points about how Jodie Whitaker would ruin the show, I would be glad to hear it. I love me some lively discussion.
But if your only basis for that opinion is her gender, then your issue is not with quality. And if you think the gender brings down quality, then you guessed it…that is entirely sexist.
And if you think it is bad because it is not traditional, why are you not outraged at the reboot, as it is a totlly different show than the classic series.
Thank you, Jim for gathering this all up in one spot I can point out to these people who feel it is not an issue.
KatG
August 1, 2017 @ 9:40 pm
The problem wasn’t that Moffat was saying that the outrage out there was baseless. We’d all agree with him on that. The problem was that he was saying that there hadn’t been any outrage — that there was no backlash and everybody loved the change. Which wasn’t true and wasn’t what Whittaker was having to deal with. Pretending that those on the front lines aren’t going through anything isn’t helping those people on the front lines — it helps those expressing the outrage that they are pretending isn’t occurring.
Essentially, Moffat was Kevin Bacon in the film Animal House shouting “Remain calm! Everything is fine!” just before the running mob tramples over him. Except the one who gets trampled is Whittaker, and it would be nice if the out-going boss showed her some support and sympathy instead of pretending that this is a walk in the park for her and that whatever comments get thrown at her is perfectly normal and not negative. Back a woman up would be nice, for a change.