Changes in Publishing
One of the frustrating things about being a new writer is that you get different advice depending on who you ask. I remember my confusion that the wisdom of Big Name Pros, the people who had been doing this for decades, was sometimes completely off-base. But it makes sense — publishing is a changing field, and some of the rules of 20 years ago are different from the rules today.
Imagine my shock when it occurred to me that I started writing 15 years ago … that my own experiences were different than those of new writers today. (Not to mention the fact that many of my fans hadn’t even been born when I started writing. Eep!)
I sat down to take a look at some of the things that have changed since I penned my first story in 1995.
1. Electronic submissions. All of my early stories were printed and mailed. I went through boxes and boxes of manila envelopes. Submitting by that new-fangled electronic mail? Unheard of. International submissions were sent with an IRC (International Reply Coupon).
2. Electronic markets. There were few online ‘zines and publishers, and those that did exist were small and often amateurish. (Strange Horizons showed up in 2000, and was the first professional-looking online ‘zine I knew of. Happy 10th Anniversary, SH!)
3. Web sites. A web presence wasn’t required, though some of us were experimenting with pages and online journals. I put up my own page on that fancy new Geocities site.
4. Submission guidelines advised you to always use a fresh ink ribbon in your printer.
5. Market Research. You still had to do your research, but my first round of agent hunting involved several hours in the MSU library, reviewing the current Literary Agent Guide. (I can’t recall the actual title of that tome.) I also subscribed to Speculations, a print publication, to keep up with the short fiction markets.
6. E-books. Wait, e-what now?
7. Standard Manuscript Format was 12-point Courier. Two spaces after periods. Underline to show italics. Does anyone even use Courier anymore, or is it hanging out with other forgotten fonts, drinking and talking about the good old days?
8. I could walk into a bookstore and introduce myself as an author, and the staff wouldn’t instinctively flinch or hide. (Also see: Vanity presses, explosion of.)
9. SFWA pro rate for short fiction was 3 cents/word.
10. My hair came down to the middle of my back. (I maintain that the hair loss is writing-related, caused by stress!)
11. There were agents charging a 10% commission. I’m not sure exactly when the switch to 15% happened, but pretty much every agent is working for 15% these days.
12. People were bemoaning the Imminent Death of Publishing, as opposed to the present day, when … um … never mind.
Strange to realize that even though my first book with DAW came out a mere four years ago, much of my experience as a new writer trying to break in is already a bit outdated. And if that’s true, imagine what it’s like for someone who broke in even further back.
I’m not saying you shouldn’t listen to professional authors who talk about this stuff. However, it’s good to be aware that publishing is constantly changing, and some advice from ten years ago might not hold today. It’s also good to pay attention to whether the author giving the advice is aware of and in touch with those changes.
So what’s changed since you started writing? Contributions to the list are welcome (as are regular old comments and discussion).
Tweets that mention Jim C. Hines » Changes in Publishing -- Topsy.com
August 4, 2010 @ 10:21 am
[…] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Dan Faust, Lisa Shearin and Michael Jasper, Jim C. Hines. Jim C. Hines said: New Post: Changes in Publishing http://bit.ly/ckRy82 […]
Joshua Bilmes
August 4, 2010 @ 11:06 am
your agent happily uses Courier 12 for his e-mails! transition to 15% commmission started around 1990ish Richard Curtis was one of the pioneers.
Jim C. Hines
August 4, 2010 @ 11:16 am
He does? Hm … apparently my e-mail software strips out that old-school formatting 😉 Though the sig. file does come through in Courier, now that I look more closely.
David
August 4, 2010 @ 12:12 pm
What font do you use now?
Jim C. Hines
August 4, 2010 @ 12:15 pm
Pretty much everything I write and submit is in Times New Roman unless the guidelines specify something different.
Barbara Friend Ish
August 4, 2010 @ 12:17 pm
Fun list! Ah, those were the days…
I can’t remember the last time someone actually delivered a ms. or a sub in Courier, now that you mention it; but I still use Courier when I’m writing. The look of those characters is how my brain knows it’s time to compose sentences, I think.
D. Moonfire
August 4, 2010 @ 12:56 pm
I love Courier. Actually any typewriter font, but Courier always has a special place in my heart. For my writing group, when I submit there, it is always in 12 point Courier with 1 inch margins. Though, I do use single space simply because they don’t write between the lines. For me, Courier puts in the “I am writing” mindset, which is why I use it so heavily, but only for writing.
Steve Buchheit
August 4, 2010 @ 1:05 pm
Hmm, I was wondering why your hair progression was further along than mine. Now I have an answer.
Yes, I know, you were just discussing ways of flipping people the bird. Why certainly, I’d like to see some examples. 🙂
Jim C. Hines
August 4, 2010 @ 1:42 pm
I’ve heard from a few other writers on LJ and Facebook who still work in Courier. I suspect a lot is habit and what you’re used to, too. Computers do make it pretty easy to reformat to anyone’s given guidelines when you’re ready to submit.
D. Moonfire
August 4, 2010 @ 2:11 pm
I actually saw a submission guideline recently that said to send it in any format as long as it didn’t use newlines at the end of lines (as opposed to paragraphs). Their justification was they can just as easily reformat for their own needs.
In our writing group, there are a few who always reformat submissions to fit what they want. I like that, simply because it makes it easier for them to work the way they want to.
Jim C. Hines
August 4, 2010 @ 2:18 pm
When I’ve done workshops in the past, I almost always ended up taking electronic subs, which meant I got to reformat the manuscripts to what I was most comfortable working with. So long as it’s not completely messed-up, it didn’t usually take that long to redo it to my preferences.
Jim C. Hines
August 4, 2010 @ 2:18 pm
Would you care to see some of those fun new brown belt techniques as well? 😛
K. L. Townsend
August 4, 2010 @ 4:27 pm
I’m still very much a newbie, but I see man places still asking for Courier as the default/standard. I’ve gotten used to using it. However, with e-subs, I see Times New Roman requested often.
But that’s been my experience. Good to know that Courier isn’t a must have though.
This was very interesting!
Taking Liberties: Catching Up with Jim C. Hines « Booklife
August 4, 2010 @ 5:41 pm
[…] story fifteen years ago.
Jim C. Hines
August 4, 2010 @ 6:23 pm
You should probably take my comments with a grain of salt, as almost everything I write is either under contract or by invitation, so I’m not as much on top of the markets and their guidelines. Meaning Courier may not be as dead as I thought 🙂
But really, the only “Must have” is whatever the market says in their guidelines.
Janet Lee Carey
August 4, 2010 @ 8:42 pm
I tend to go with the flow, but still panic when sending 400 pg novels via attachment — vanish!!
Still glad to save printer ink and postage!
sean
August 4, 2010 @ 10:45 pm
Don’t make me throw off the Courier gloves. Any technical document I make at work for users is in Courier. It is easy to read the you never have to guess at letters. Users have enough problems being users (I am a UNIX sysadmin and typing 1 or l can make a BIG difference).
Courier is the bombdiggidy of all that is holy. Maybe i am just old school, but i like being old school, sorry old skool.
I bet jig uses Courier.
Sean
Elizabeth Moon
August 4, 2010 @ 11:51 pm
Well, I still use Courier for fiction submissions and so far no editor has pointed a finger and me and hooted. If I were facing a new publisher, I’d ask what their preference was and use that, but my current one seems happy with old-fashioned formatting, including the underlining for italics. And since I’ve used it for years, I have a feel for pacing, etc., from that familiar format while writing.
For most correspondence and various report things I have to do (annual report on the wildlife management project) I use Times Roman, and actual italics or bold or whatever I feel like enhances that project. Occasionally I’ll use a non-serifed font, and for special projects I’ll use all sorts of things (Garamond, Antique Copperplate Bold, etc.)
One modernism I really dislike is using only one space after periods. For one thing, it was beaten into me in typing class that the thumb hits the space bar boom-boom after a period and I can’t easily stop it now (and going back to excise a space takes time.) For another, I find the squashed online format, with only that one space often mandatory, hard to read. I’m normally a very fast reader, and in column (like a blog or many websites) my eye automatically chunks meaning by the gaps (esp when the font size is small and I can’t see the difference between periods and commas anyway.) So if the expected gap size doesn’t exist, the sentences run together and it slows my reading down. Do not like slow.
But then…my first (unaccepted) manuscripts went off straight from a typewriter. First an old Royal portable, then my step-grandmother’s half-electric Smith-Corona. My first accepted fiction mss came off an impact printer (you had a choice: dot matrix, which editors didn’t want, or something like the Spinwriter, which I used. The low-end version.) Absolutely loved writing on computer when I got one (1983, and used WordStar) and do 98% of my writing on it (sometimes go to paper to work out stuff when brainstorming is needed.) Now–I print out a manuscript for my own use, for revision, on an ink-jet printer (which also does a good job on my photographs and has done business cards as well), then email it to my editor. Great savings in shipping costs and worries (things get lost.)
As for writers trying to break in…I tell them to look at the submission guidelines on publisher websites. And until my editor says “Will you PLEASE quit using that boring old Courier!” I’ll use that boring old Courier. Ancient of days that I am, after all.
Liane Merciel
August 5, 2010 @ 8:37 am
I do all my _writing_ in single-spaced 10-pt Arial (dead giveaway that I developed my habits during the late-’90s Age of AOL, when that was the default font setting for just about everything) but convert it to double-spaced 12-pt TNR before submitting.
It’s funny how attached you can get to a particular font and typesize. Anything else feels weird to me; it’s like trying to walk with a tiny little stone in your shoe. Yeah, you can still get to where you’re going, but it’ll bug you every step of the way.
Jim C. Hines
August 5, 2010 @ 8:47 am
I have a similar process, though I can’t imagine writing in Arial 🙂 But the format I use when I’m working on a manuscript is very different from the format I convert to before submitting it.
Jim C. Hines
August 5, 2010 @ 8:47 am
I always get a little nervous that I’m going to type in the wrong e-mail address and end up sending my novel to some random person in Canada.
Jim C. Hines
August 5, 2010 @ 8:49 am
All right, I surrender! Today’s blog post includes a Courier retraction. I formally apologize to Courier, Arial, and any other fonts I may have inadvertently offended.
Except Comic Sans. I mean, come on…
Jim C. Hines
August 5, 2010 @ 8:53 am
Submission guidelines trump all, and if a writer isn’t checking them before submitting, then that writer deserves whatever rejection he/she receives.
Apparently I underestimated Courier … which actually kind of illustrates the point I wanted to make about pros occasionally being out of touch 🙂 At this point in my career, I do most of my writing for DAW, both novels and short fiction by invitation. I think I’ve fallen into the trap of assuming that because I’ve been doing it in a certain way for years, everyone else must be doing the same. But judging from the responses, Courier is alive and well and planning to get together with Comic Sans to kick my ass for mocking them.
I’m with you on the two-space thing, though. I can’t train myself out of that habit. I do a global find/replace after finishing a manuscript to strip those two-spaces down to one, but it’s how I learned to type (on a typewriter, no less), and it’s just what my thumb does.
D. Moonfire
August 5, 2010 @ 9:11 am
I’ll admit, any time I see someone using Comic Sans, I sent them to Blambot (http://www.blambot.com/) or at least something slightly different.
Jim C. Hines
August 5, 2010 @ 9:14 am
Ooh — must save that link in case I ever get around to playing with comics…
Matthew Dyer
August 5, 2010 @ 10:42 am
I’m a technical writer by trade, and over the years I’ve also become a bit of a font snob.
There’s nothing wrong with Courier, per se, but there are plenty of reasons other fonts are better choices. I get that a lot of people are comfortable with it from years of experience. But there’s nothing about it that makes it superior to a font like Times Roman.
If the editor is reading on a screen, they would probably be better served by a sans serif font like Helvetica or Arial.
The two spaces after a sentence thing is another matter. There are several reasons not to use two spaces after a sentence. The biggest one is that modern fonts add some buffer space there, making two actual spaces too much space.
Elizabeth Donald
August 5, 2010 @ 11:51 am
Adding my Courier love! Only problem is that it’s a fat font, probably adds several pages to my manuscripts. But then my editor thinks I’m giving him more bang for his buck! So to speak. 🙂