Avatar
Given all the buzz about Avatar, I really wanted to see this in the theater. Of course, thanks to that same buzz, I had a pretty good idea what to expect: beautiful effects coupled with a relatively unoriginal story.
There’s been a lot of criticism about this one. Over at i09, Annalee Newitz criticizes it as a white man’s guilt movie. Others describe it as a mutant love child of Ferngully, Dances with Wolves, Pocahontas, and the Smurfs.
Valid points, but they miss one very important question: All those mind-blowing special effects, and your subtitles are in Papyrus font? Really?
Moving on to more serious (and spoilery) thoughts, in no particular order…
Terrorism. Colonel Scar comments late in the movie, “We’ll fight terrorism with terror,” or something to that effect. Implying that the Na’vi are the terrorists. (We do see evidence that the Na’vi have been attacking the equipment, and Neytiri was ready to put an arrow through Jake.) So in this movie, the terrorists are the good guys? Fascinating … and it makes me wish the movie had the courage to explore this more directly. Instead, the Na’vi’s terrorist acts are off-screen. The humans move into the terrorist role, blowing up the tower tree, and Jake leads the Na’vi in a more “honorable” battle. (See David Forbes’ review here for more on the terrorism theme.)
Aliens. I wanted to see some. The USB port is a nifty idea, but these people laugh, smile, cry, and kiss. They hunt with bow and arrow. They’re heterosexual (as far as we see, at least) and monogamous for life. Okay, that last is a bit alien. But basically, they’re big blue CGI humans. I’ve had coworkers who were more alien.
Story. Predictable. “Oh, that must be how they’re going to transfer Jake into his Na’vi body at the end.” “Oh, so Jake’s going to have to level up to master dragonrider to redeem himself.” The latter piece bugged me. Only five Na’vi — and the chosen one, Jake Sully — have ever figured out that all you have to do is fly higher? Sorry, but that was way too easy.
The Chosen One. I don’t mean Jake Sully. Sure, Jake rode the dragon and rallied the troops (half of whom promptly got mowed down by machine guns). But Grace was the one who merged with the tree of souls. Depending on how you interpret Jake’s prayer scene near the end, Grace is the one who shared that direct knowledge with the hivemind. When Pandora wakes up and starts trashing bozos, I see Grace as the key character, and I wish the movie had done more with that.
Unobtanium. Really?[2. I’m told this is supposed to be an inside joke. Sorry, but no. When 90% of the audience doesn’t get it, and when a good portion of those people are kicked out of the movie to roll their eyes, then your joke has failed.]
White Man’s Guilt. Blatant parallels to North American colonization history here. Blue stand-ins for Native Americans? Check. Technologically advanced civilization wiping them out in order to plunder? Check. Schools to teach the natives English? Check. Romanticized view of “how we were meant to live”? Check. But this time, the white man is also the savior, allowing me to feel good about myself.
It does make sense for Jake to have a key role. He’s the one who knows what the Na’vi are up against. He should be involved in the planning. But the idea that in 3-4 months, he goes from clueless human to the Awesomest Na’vi Savior? Now we’ve gone from SF to fantasy.
Pandora had the ability to save itself, and did so. (See my paragraph on Grace’s role.) Jake wasn’t needed in the savior role.
ETA — Sexism: Was hurrying to get this post written, and forgot to include this one. Thanks Catherine for jogging my brain. Jake “becomes a man,” and is now entitled to choose a woman. The movie never goes anywhere with this aspect of Na’vi culture, but damn — there’s an awful lot packed into one line. (As a good guy, Jake of course gives his intended the right to choose/consent.)
Overall: Enjoyed it. Suspect it might drag a bit when seen on DVD. (Too many “behold the nifty” scenes.) Worth seeing for the effects. Papyrus font not too distracting after the first few minutes.
Comments and thoughts welcome, as always!
—
Steve Buchheit
January 11, 2010 @ 10:10 am
Papyrus? Somewhere in a parallel dimension, Jan Tschichold is crying.
David Forbes
January 11, 2010 @ 10:27 am
Good point about the aliens not really being “alien” at all except in size and color. Other than that, I agree with most of what you (and others) have said, but for whatever reason it really didn’t bother me when I watched it. As I said in my write-up, I think Cameron deliberately used a well-known story for accessibility and familiarity. It worked for some, but for those who wanted more originality, not so much.
D. Moonfire
January 11, 2010 @ 10:38 am
At least it wasn’t Comic Sans.
Ann Marie
January 11, 2010 @ 10:49 am
I coulda really dug a movie where the whole planet expelled the intruder, and not just the big explosions finale we got. Too many of these don’t have real strategies in their David vs. Goliath battles (and there are some in history)–rather, they fall back on “we’re in the right and we have heart, so our bows and arrows trump your cargo bays full of explosives.” Comes back to the notion of showing something actually alien (uh-oh, am I calling peaceful resistance alien?), and what’s the right way to live. You can keep your guns as long as you stop and smell the flowers?
Jim C. Hines
January 11, 2010 @ 10:53 am
I definitely enjoyed the experience. But I do think it had problems, and it could have been so much more…
KatG
January 11, 2010 @ 12:26 pm
Yeah, my husband brought me “Bad Movie Bingo: Avatar” done by a columnist and it had as a square: “Pre-industrial societies have equality between genders” and I pointed out that this was incorrect. Jake’s babe was expected to marry the warrior chosen by her parents to be the next leader, and Jake is indeed told that he can chose a woman, indicating no choice on the women’s part, though Jake gallantly says he wants his woman to chose him back. And once they mate, they aren’t apparently allowed to be with someone else, so obviously female virginity is prized as well. So it’s not exactly a women’s lib movie. Maybe those four expensive divorces have Cameron a bit sour. The entire film was filled with military machoism on an epic scale, often leading to large logic plotholes. I wouldn’t have minded a predictable plot if it at least had made sense.
I also agree that Sigourney Weaver’s character was the most interesting one in the whole crew, and the dynamics between her and Jake were a lot more interesting to me than the ones between Jake and the blue folk.
erika
January 11, 2010 @ 1:39 pm
Are you glad you didn’t take your daughter? Agree it was too much for a 9-10-year-old or not?
I liked it a lot, but couldn’t see it in 3D. 3D gives me migraines. Blah. It was still amazing to see on the big screen. Frustrating if you think too much about what it could have been, like you said.
Jim C. Hines
January 11, 2010 @ 1:43 pm
You and Amy both on the migraines 🙂
I think I probably could have taken her along. I don’t know that she would have enjoyed the movie, but I don’t think it would have traumatized her. Some of the early parts might have been a bit frightening, but nothing too over-the-top.
Jim C. Hines
January 11, 2010 @ 4:12 pm
That would have been a fun story to watch. I do understand that you’d be getting into more hard-core SFnal ideas, and that the movie might lose accessibility … but that doesn’t stop me from wanting it 🙂
Jim C. Hines
January 11, 2010 @ 4:12 pm
I don’t suppose the Bingo card is online anywhere?
Steven Saus
January 11, 2010 @ 4:23 pm
My 12-year-old was good with it, erika. And one of the things that struck me was that the 3D (for once) did NOT give me a headache.
Steven Saus
January 11, 2010 @ 4:26 pm
Jim, I took it as being a parable/morality tale about *modern* industrialization. Sure, I’ve seen the Avatar==Pocahontas thing, but it reminded me more of today’s Western world getting resources from developing countries – and definitely taking advantage of them.
Maybe that’s because the pattern hasn’t changed much in a couple of centuries, but that’s a different question.
Liz
January 11, 2010 @ 10:31 pm
I thought that Avatar was visually stunning, but for story was lacking. I agree that Grace should have been focused on more, and that some of the plot holes should have been filled. I had a lot of problems with those holes. My main problem was, as you put it, the usb port. A long braid with tentacles coming out the end. Are they born with it braided, or do they have to do that themselves? It is the way they bond with their environment, and apparently each other, so does that mean that they are having sex with all those plants and animals? In the theater, every time they went for a ride on some animal or talked to a tree, I couldn’t help thinking that. It seemed to me that the whole thing wasn’t as thought out as it could/should have been.
Anyways, as for people looking for deeper meaning in an otherwise thin story, Jon Evans at Tor.com says some interesting things about a theme of the movie being Science Fiction vs. Fantasy ( http://www.tor.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=blog&id=58526 )
KatG
January 12, 2010 @ 11:58 am
He downloaded it from the podcast from the Geek Survival Guide:
http://gsguide.blogspot.com/
Most of the card was accurate, but a tad was off on detail and it had that one error. Still amusing, though.
Jim C. Hines
January 12, 2010 @ 3:32 pm
Nice! Thanks for the link!
Zach Ricks
January 21, 2010 @ 10:52 am
Thanks for the link, and the complimentary words.
As for the error, you’re not necessarily going to fill in every space on a bingo card, right? Besides, I saw her role as being a lot more “equal” to the males in the tribe than I think you would have seen in, say, most American Indian tribes, but I could be wrong, and it’s certainly open to interpretation.
And, of course, it’s meant as comedy.