“Why Can’t I Write About __________?”
“As an author, I should be able to write about I want! Nothing is off-limits to art and creativity.”
I see this refrain again and again in conversations about everything from cultural appropriation in storytelling (and elsewhere) to writing characters of another race/gender/culture/orientation to writing about rape. It comes up in other contexts as well. “Why can’t I as a white person paint my face brown for cosplay?” or “Telling me I can’t use the n-word is suppressing my free speech!” But I want to focus on the writing aspect for now.
The thing is, you can write about anything you want. Nobody is going to come to your home and take away your computer because you wrote another so-called romance between a Nazi and a Jew. Nobody will revoke your Author’s License for adding another gratuitous rape scene because you wanted “historical accuracy” in your fantasy story about dragons and elves and talking swords. Nobody will drag you to jail for perpetuating stereotypes of magical negroes or mystical Indians. Yay, freedom!
“But no matter what I write, someone will choose to be offended!”
Y’all can see the underlying assumption here, right? That people are simply choosing to be offended — running around looking for reasons to be angry. The implication being that these criticisms aren’t things that any “reasonable” or “normal” person would get upset about. It’s generally just an excuse to ignore criticism and attack the critics.
It’s true that if you write and publish, odds are you’ll eventually produce something people take offense to. Not because there are hordes of people searching for reasons to be offended, but because none of us are perfect. As authors, we grew up in a world full of conflict and prejudice and stereotypes. We make mistakes. We step on other people’s toes.
We’re allowed to write what we want. And people are allowed to be offended. They’re allowed to be angry. Free speech works both ways. We get to write our stories, and others get to offer criticism.
“Well, art should be offensive!”
Being offensive doesn’t make something art. Being offensive doesn’t make you right. (See, for example, the KKK.)
One of the things that makes stories so powerful is their ability to challenge readers. Ask yourself, who are you challenging? Who are you offending?
I’ve seen people hold themselves up as the epitome of courage for daring to write “dangerous” stories. “Look at me, daring to be offensive!” And it’s weird, because most of the time if I read their stories, they aren’t challenging people in power. They’re attacking people who are already marginalized and oppressed. They’re going after those with less power.
That’s not daring and dangerous; it’s old-fashioned bullying.
“What if I didn’t intend to be offensive? Why are people still getting mad?”
I didn’t intend to step on my cat’s paw earlier tonight when he snuck up behind me in the kitchen. It still hurt him when I did. (He forgave me a few minutes later, and went right back to crouching behind my legs in case I dropped food. He’s not the brightest beast.)
The point is, whatever your intention, people are telling you they’re hurt/angry/offended/upset/dismayed by something you wrote. Maybe it’s a science fictional future that omits any people of color or anyone who isn’t straight. If you tell me you didn’t intentionally try to eliminate those people from your universe, I’ll probably believe you.
But intentional or not, you still erased large groups of people from your story. Believe me, you’re not the first. Authors have been writing that kind of exclusionary fiction pretty much forever. Which is part of the problem…
As authors, we’re supposed to be able to empathize and connect with different kinds of characters. Imagine being on the receiving end of this stuff. Of reading yet another book where it’s a few hundred years in the future, and apparently there was some unwritten genocide that wiped out all the black people. It gets really tiresome.
Here’s the kicker. Generally, people aren’t saying you’re a horrible human being who should be banished to the tenth circle of hell to have your giblets chewed apart by rusty robot parrots for all eternity. They’re saying, “Hey, I’ve got a problem with this thing you wrote.”
What you do with that criticism is on you. You can listen to it, and maybe learn something. You can take it personally and unleash your wrath in a Very Pointed Blog Post.
But if you’re so upset about someone criticizing your work, do you really want to double-down and escalate things?
“But we have Black Panther and a female Doctor and women are winning Hugo awards now and why are people holding on to inequity from the past when everything’s better?”
You realize a few victories doesn’t magically erase centuries of inequity and oppression, right? That the effects of institutionalized racism, sexism, and other forms of discrimination last for generations? For example, here are some stats on racial inequality in America. Shockingly, things like a black actress playing Hermione Granger didn’t instantly fix it all.
In some ways, things are better than they used to be. Interracial marriage has been legal in the U.S. for a whole 50 years. Same-sex marriage was legalized nationwide two years ago. Women have been allowed to vote for almost a hundred years. (Of course, they couldn’t get their own credit card until the 1970s, and marital rape wasn’t outlawed nationwide until 1993…)
We’ve taken some steps forward. For every one, we’ve had people pushing back hard.
A lot of those dates are a hell of a lot more recent than I would have thought. These are things from my grandparents’ lifetimes. From my parents’ lifetimes. Some of them are within my lifetime. Inequity from the past continues to impact the present. So does inequity in the present.
“You’ve gone on for 900 words, Hines. Get to the point.”
You can write about ________. What you can’t do is prevent others from challenging or criticizing what you write.
Stories are powerful, and with great power comes great responsibility. And lots of rebooted movie franchises.
The point is, you’re responsible for your writing. You’re responsible for the stories you choose to tell, the characters you choose to create. You’re responsible for the assumptions you bring into the story. You’re responsible for choosing whether or not to educate yourself on the subjects and the people you write about.
You own your stories. When they’re brilliant, you own that. When they’re hurtful or offensive? You own that too.
It’s part of being an author.
Barbara Doran
August 3, 2017 @ 7:50 pm
Thanks, Jim. I’m on a panel this weekend on a similar subject and this helps me codify some of what I want to express.
D. D. Webb
August 3, 2017 @ 8:12 pm
Incisively put as always, Mr. Hines.
I can attest as an author (and as a retail veteran) that “phony outrage” is a real thing; people pretending to get upset in order to get attention is pretty common human behavior. But honestly, I see less of it in the world than people complaining about phony outrage, and I would even venture to say that in my opinion, phony outrage is less of a problem than people complaining about it. The fake outrage rarely goes far; the complaints are used to justify a whole host of ills.
It’s not like it’s hard to spot, either. I’ve found that when my work has upset someone for any reason, they will tell me why; even if it’s for reasons that seem strange to me (which has been generally the case as I mostly wouldn’t have written the offensive thing if I’d thought of that), this is usually cogent and sensible. I’ve learned from these encounters, more often than not. The ones who start with a string of fallacies and then immediately turn to trolling tactics when responded to, well… It’s mostly pretty transparent, is what I’m saying. It’s a compound shame that the trolls’ existence makes such a convenient excuse to brush aside people who have legitimate complaints. Which is the majority of them.
It’s not super hard to write work that doesn’t attack people who don’t deserve it, either. Just takes a little care in the craft, that’s all.
stardreamer
August 3, 2017 @ 8:15 pm
The fact that no one understands you does not make you an artist.
Similarly, the fact that some art is offensive doesn’t mean that all offensive things are art.
And critics of offensive art have the same freedom of speech that the artist does.
Tamara Griesel
August 3, 2017 @ 8:47 pm
Struggling with this right now, with a first novel (space opera, theater troupe in space). I definitely do not want to perpetuate the everybody in space is white thing, but I don’t want to be guilty of cultural appropriation either–especially with my captain, who has been telling me she is a Sikh for quite a while now.
So far as I can tell, the best thing I can do is research my buns off about as many Earth cultures as I can, and do as good a job as I can with the colonial cultures I create.
Jim C. Hines
August 3, 2017 @ 9:44 pm
Tamara – Another possibility is looking for Sikh beta readers when the book is ready.
Craig Laurance Gidney
August 4, 2017 @ 10:52 am
I remember when I read Andre Norton’s Lavender Green Magic, an Edgar Eager style fantasy featuring a black family. I re-read it recently and saw that there were some hamfisted moments in Norton’s portrayal. You know what? I still applaud Norton for attempting to diversify YA fantasy. Write what you want. But edit carefully. (I’ve written what and whomever I want. But if anything is iffy-sounding, I keep it on the hard drive while trying to find a sensitivity reader)
Patrick
August 4, 2017 @ 11:33 am
We do live in a bizarro world where the people most likely to cry “free speech” are people who want to be able to say horribly racist and sexist things without any consequences. It’s also interesting that “PC Culture” has become such a boogeyman, when really the harm caused by political correctness run amok is vastly outweighed by the harm caused by the racism, sexism, and inequality that political correctness is trying to address. one in ten black men being incarcerated vs. a handful of professors being disciplined; an overtly racist administration that is scapegoating blacks and immigrants vs. Ann Coulter not being allowed to speak at UC Berkeley.
however, we also live in a world where being outraged has become a hobby for a lot of people, on the left and the right. I think the part of the internet that isn’t actual porn or cat videos is mostly outrage porn ((You won’t believe the racist thing this person did! You won’t believe the crazy things the liberals in this town have done!”) None of it is really conducive to having meaningful conversations about serious issues. It is just meant to rile people up and give them the wonderful endorphin rush of being righteously angry. I have seen, time and time again, where someone doing something slightly boneheaded or tone deaf becomes An Internet Thing and there are a million think pieces written about it and people with opposing views piling on and on and on.
So that outrage culture exists. Doesn’t mean that people can’t be outraged or aren’t legitimately offended, or that they aren’t right to be offended, but I think the way that offense is presented online is not always super constructive.
One thing I’d recommend is having actual in person conversations with people about these issues. I think conversations about these topics online don’t tend to be as fruitful as discussions in person. At least in my experience.
Jaws
August 4, 2017 @ 11:41 am
At one further level of abstraction:
You also cannot prevent someone with a platform and agenda from making what you wrote into something you did not intend. (Sometimes, of course, they’re right…) This is the corollary of “art can be dangerous, or at least different”: The is not, and cannot be, pure consensus. To choose an example from dead-white-guy land, there would be no disagreements over the relative (or even “objective”) merits of Liszt, Brahms, and Chopins’ respective adaptations of central European folk themes into works for the upper/upper-middle-class white-guy audience if consensus were possible… but tell that to those who are emotionally invested in the respective folk traditions. Or, better yet, don’t, because it will make the current arguments over “appropriation” in contemporary American fictionwriting seem mild, measured, and polite.
The problem is frequently not with the “work of art” itself: It is with reactions to the “work of art.” They are related, but not the same thing. Sometimes we get Atlas Shrugged, and sometimes we get The Iron Dream… and sometimes we get something in between, or for which the artist/author him/her/it/themself is unclear.
News & Notes – 8/05/17 – The Bookwyrm’s Hoard
August 5, 2017 @ 12:00 am
[…] “Why Can’t I Write About _____?” Jim C. Hines talks about… well, it’s hard to sum up in a single phrase. Basically, it’s a well-reasoned response to the question, “Why can’t I write about whatever I want?” (with the implied subtext “regardless of whether other people find it hurtful or offensive.”) […]
Josef Matulich
August 5, 2017 @ 12:39 pm
I don’t know if I’m shooting myself in the foot here, but I’m going in anyway. Sometimes, people will be offended by what I write just because they have beliefs that are practically dogma. Some Christian readers will drop my books as if burned just because of the pentacles on the cover. More left-leaning readers will lambaste me for the villain who is reinforcing the “bisexuals are promiscuous” stereotype when he is patterning himself after Aleister Crowley. What I’m trying to say is, that if you haven’t offended SOMEBODY, you haven’t said anything at all. Just no need to be a dick about it.
Eleanor Ray
August 5, 2017 @ 9:06 pm
I am also far more comfortable when, if I mention that I have an issue with something someone wrote, they think about my concern and then answer honestly. That can mean anything from “Oh! I am sorry, I didn’t mean that!” to “Oh, I never thought of that way of looking at it, and I am not sure I agree with you about its implications, but thank you for giving me something to think about.” to “I thought of that, I don’t agree with you and here is why, but I respect that something I wrote upset you, and I take it seriously.”
What each of those includes is the understanding that the person who was hurt or offended has the right to their own experience, even if the writer does not agree with that assessment of the work. If both people are honest but courteous, there is no negation of either person’s right to their world view, even when there is disagreement on it.
Trolls weaken the discourse by raising not only the “noise-to-signal” ratio in a discussion, but by breaking down (often by repetition of the negative example) the basic fundiment of discourse: listening respectfully to the other person’s view.
It comes down to courtesy born of the respect for another’s human experience. I can be told I am stupid for disagreeing with someone, or I can be told I am not being agreed with. The first denies my experience, and leaves us both angry. The second may be uncomfortable, but it promotes us treating one another like human beings, not like irritants or obstacles.
I recommend human decency over human huffishness every time.
Beth Hudson Wheeler
August 6, 2017 @ 12:04 pm
Patrick — this is a side point, but it never occurred to me that people get a high out of feeling anger. Since I despise adrenaline rushes, I am often totally clueless about why people seem disposed to create havoc for no apparent reason. Thank you for helping me make sense out of the issue.
HelenS
August 7, 2017 @ 4:05 pm
Spiralsheep had a really, really strong reaction to Lavender-Green Magic. Had her spitting tacks, IIRC. Can’t find the post at the moment.
HelenS
August 7, 2017 @ 6:25 pm
Found it: https://spiralsheep.dreamwidth.org/578707.html
Monthly Recap August 2017 – The Illustrated Page
August 31, 2017 @ 8:02 am
[…] “Why Can’t I Write About ________?” Jim Chines on why not every story idea is a great one (prime example: people who keep writing Nazi romances). […]
Alice
October 14, 2017 @ 6:57 pm
Well to be honest I think getting offended or not is a cultural thing – as in, situations in which you’ll get offended really depends of your culture. For example, the infamous “black people’s skin color should never be described with food comparison”.
I’m French, living in France, with mostly French friends. Many of them are POC, some of them are aspiring writers like me. I asked them what they thought about that specific line of thought. All of them answered that they really did not care if they were described at coffe/chocolate/cinnamon-skinned. If we had been living in America I’m pretty sure the answer would have been different.
In every group, there are people who will get offended at some things while other will say it’s fine. For example, Japanese people with that kimono thing that happened in an American museum where tourists could be photographed in front of a painting, wearing a kimono. Lots of Japanese people said they really did not get why American people were angry because “a kimono is just an article of clothing”. Others said that yes it was cultural appropriation.
So… in very clumsy wording (please keep in mind that English in not my first language and that I’m not trying to be offensive, I may have directly translated things that were not offensive in French but are in English ? I don’t know) I think it’s far from being a black and white issue.
I mean, even in my group of beta readers opinions are very different ! We have one writer who writes a fantasy story that include slaves (basically, humans are enslaved by an immortal race and trying to start a revolt) and he has POC characters. “So you have black slaves in your story… that’s really tactless don’t you think ?” someone said, others disagreed because he did not only have black slaves in the story and the way he presented slavery was very clear about how wrong he thought it was. Opinions, I mean, there are as many as there are people.
Now I think no work will ever satisfy everybody (and there ARE people who really search for ways to be offended, I’ve seen it in “minority communities” I’m part of. I guess these kind of people also exist in “ethnic communities”) ; but we should aim at offending the least possible. People will critic, and in most cases they won’t be either right or wrong in an absolute way. I don’t think you ALWAYS have to “learn” from people who are offended (because you might disagree with them and it’s fine as long as you REALLY try to think about their opinions, just considering those agreeing with you is too easy) but you should always do research before writing. Then you must go from there because there is no magical guide to writing and being tactful anyway.