The Readercon Mess
Much of the SF/F community has posted about the Readercon mess, where Rene Walling harassed and stalked Genevieve Valentine throughout the convention. BC Holmes has a roundup of links and discussion here.
Readercon’s official statement announced that Walling had been banned from Readercon “for at least two years.” Honestly, my first reaction was relief that they had done anything at all, given how often this sort of behavior gets ignored or excused. But then I read further, and discovered that Readercon has a zero-tolerance policy about sexual harassment:
“Harassment of any kind — including physical assault, battery, deliberate intimidation, stalking, or unwelcome physical attentions — will not be tolerated at Readercon and will result in permanent suspension of membership.”
There was no question that Walling’s behavior fell under this definition. The board at Readercon simply chose to ignore their own policy. I’m sure they believe they had good reason. I’m equally sure it doesn’t matter. Whatever you might think of zero-tolerance policies, Readercon made a promise to its members that sexual harassment would not be tolerated, and would be dealt with in a certain way.
They broke that promise.
I’m not going to write a long rant here, both because I’m still recovering from the last rant, and because so many others have made the points I would have made (usually better than I would have done). Here are a few links I wanted to highlight:
- Genevieve Valentine’s original post, response to the verdict, and her follow-up.
- Rose Lemberg: Enough with the Aspie Bit Already. What she said, dammit! If you hear about someone sexually harassing another person, and your instinct is to assume a) Oh, they must be one of those Aspie types and/or b) that this somehow makes it okay, then please just go the hell away. My son is ASD, and I don’t have the spoons to deal with you right now.
- Elizabeth Bear: It’s not about the man. From Bear’s post, “We are not calling for Walling’s punishment. We are calling for the right of Valentine and other women to exist in an environment without predators.”
- Rose Fox: This is the opposite of what I wanted. Rose has decided to remain on the concom for Readercon. I appreciate and respect her for making this choice, and for working from within to try to make Readercon a safer place.
- Concom member Matthew Cheney has resigned as a result of this decision. “I want to live in a world that’s more about rehabilitation than punishment. But rehabilitation is not the responsibility of an event or its committees. If you hold an event, your job is to make sure the people who attend are as safe as you can reasonably ensure.”
- Veronica Schanoes’ petition to the Readercon Board.
I hope other conventions are paying attention and taking notes on what to do and what not to do in order to create a safe environment for their attendees.
Under the Beret » The Readercon Thing
July 30, 2012 @ 9:57 am
[…] Jim C. Hines: “The Readercon Mess” […]
Dark Matter Fanzine
July 30, 2012 @ 10:18 am
Good for you; not the first post I’ve read on this topic but a good one. Furthermore as a person of influence, your post carries weight. Your silence would have been seen as agreement with the verdict or that you didn’t think this was important.
A couple of years ago I was on a committee that supposedly had a sexual harassment policy. A middle-aged male new visitor initiated a hug with a young woman and trailed his hands down her body. The woman’s mother said she had to learn to deal with that kind of treatment herself. The woman refused to make any kind of complaint. You might wonder why this was an issue and even how I heard about it. Another committee member saw the incident and raised the issue as a point of concern. The president lobbied to allow the new visitor to join the club: it meant cashy-money. I used my two counselling degrees and experience in working with victims of various kinds of sexual abuse to argue for the club to stand by its zero-tolerance policy. Within a few weeks I was forced to resign from the committee* and I believe that man was allowed to join the club shortly afterwards.
Short-term financial gain from predators leads to long-term financial loss because the victims and concerned parties cease paying their memberships. The sooner all committees and convenors learn these lessons, the sooner fandom can get on with the business of having fun.
*not the only reason behind my departure
Jim C. Hines
July 30, 2012 @ 10:30 am
There is just so much WRONG in that story.
Lesson from the mother: “Sexual harassment is normal and nobody will help you.”
Lesson from the committee: “Money is more important than the safety of women.”
It sounds like you did everything you could. I can’t imagine how frustrating and angering this must have been.
Alan Wexelblat
July 30, 2012 @ 11:10 am
Amen. I don’t even understand why there’s a discussion here. Readercon has a policy that is clear and unambiguous. That policy is published and every attendee is supposed to read it and follow it as a condition of attending. Likewise, the organization that issued that policy is bound to follow it so long as it stands. If they want a different policy they should go make one, but this is the one they have now and it should be enforced as written. End of story.
Galena
July 30, 2012 @ 12:46 pm
Weeeelp, I hope ignoring their harrassment policy works out for them in the end (/sarcasm). I’d heard of Readercon as one of the few cons that had a concrete harrassment policy in place that they weren’t afraid to enforce; therefore Readercon was on my short list of cons to go to one day when I have money. Now that I know they don’t give a flip about attendee safety when the perpetrators are BFDs, I know that I won’t ever be giving them my money. And I feel like that’s the takeaway for a LOT of people after this ridiculous mess. If they thought it was worth it to keep a heinous pig around because “he felt sorry” I hope they also find the loss of revenues worth it. I mean, when they can’t even protect an invited author guest, I feel zero safety. Absolute zilch.
Not bad. « lovelylikebeestings
July 30, 2012 @ 5:49 pm
[…] regards to the Readercon post, author Jim Hines shared an update about a member of the con committee resigning out of disgust, and another staying […]
Ashley F. Miller
July 30, 2012 @ 5:54 pm
The other huge problem is that Readercon *did* enforce this policy in 2008 when someone else was harassed by someone who wasn’t considered “important” in any way. If they had merely broken with their zero tolerance policy, it would have been heinous, but to do so because this particular harasser happens to be someone with some clout is unforgivable.
Jim C. Hines
July 30, 2012 @ 6:37 pm
No argument here.
Joe Selby
July 31, 2012 @ 9:49 am
For criminal laws, I support judicial discretion. I don’t like laws that require X offenders to be sentenced to Y no matter what the circumstances. And I’ve heard people make the same comparison here, but I don’t get it. Where is there “nuance”? The only nuance I see is that the guy is a blogger for tor.com. If that’s the measure of success required to nuance a criminal act, then that’s a really low bar to hurdle. What entitlement does that make for genuinely successful best sellers?
Attendee = scumbag? Get rid of him/her. Easy peasy.
“Victim” makes false claim (another scenario people cite as nuanced)? That’s not nuance. That’s a lie. Liars = scumbags. Easy peasy. I’m really confused as to why ReaderCon would think to treat a scumbag with kid gloves (thereby encouraging other scumbags). Who would want to attend such an environment even if you were not the victim yourself? It just sucks away all the positivity of the experience.
Dark Matter Fanzine
July 31, 2012 @ 9:53 am
Has Tor.com been told about their writer’s behaviour? Continuing to support him in spite of a known history of (at best) inappropriate conduct would be tantamount to condoning this behaviour, especially when this behaviour detrimentally impacts their readers (hence it impacts their source of cash flow and their reason for being)
Jim C. Hines
July 31, 2012 @ 3:27 pm
I think so, but I’m not sure. I’m told Walling’s most recent column had been pulled, but I don’t know what’s going on behind-the-scenes.
The Readercon Mess (David Louis Edelman)
August 7, 2012 @ 1:07 am
[…] that there are very convincing rebuttals for some of the points that I’ve raised. I find that Jim Hines and Elizabeth Bear tend to be good sources of discussion on topics like […]
R. W. Ware
September 11, 2012 @ 1:17 pm
haven’t read this, you’ll appreciate it: http://readercon.org/publicstatement.htm