E-book Pricing
My post on royalties earlier this week generated some interesting responses, particularly with regard to e-book sales. My e-book sales were, at best, 4.3% of my total sales (for The Stepsister Scheme).
Several people said my e-books were priced too high. The printed book cost $7.99 (U.S.), whereas the e-book was available for $6.99. If the price were lower, I’d sell more e-books.[1. Please note that I have no control over my book prices. Those are set by the publisher.]
Well … sure. And if the price of the paperback were cheaper, I’d sell more of those. That’s basic economics.
Beneath those responses is, I think, the belief that e-books just aren’t worth $6.99. We’re still arguing over the value of an e-book, meaning both how much does it cost to produce, and how much are people willing to pay?
There’s an assumption that e-books should be cheap because there’s no printing cost. But printing costs are only about 8-10% of the overall cost of producing a book. Shipping and storage are also a factor, but the majority of the costs aren’t about the physical book.
For the sake of argument, I’m talking about professional, commercially produced books. You have to pay the author’s advance and royalties, the cover artist, the editor, the copy editor, the typesetter, the sales force, and that doesn’t even get into distributor costs or the percentages taken by retailers.
“But then how do you explain all of those cheap/free e-books on Amazon, Jim? If they can do it, why can’t you?”
I can, actually. I’m planning to re-release Goldfish Dreams as an e-book, and it will be significantly cheaper than my other books. This book has already been commercially published once, and the rights have reverted to me. So a lot of the professional work has already been done.
When the rights revert to me for my other books, I may consider doing something similar. Cheap e-books seem like one good way to keep an author’s old backlist in print.
But those initial production costs have to get covered somewhere. Sure, I could skip straight to self-publishing for my next book and bypass the publisher, but I don’t have the expertise to produce a good product, and I don’t have the sales force or distribution to get that product out there.
One thing I’ve considered is that it might be cool if the e-book price dropped 50% a year or two after a book came out, assuming the book earned back most of its costs in that first year. But then, why couldn’t you do the same with the print book? (I’m sure there are reasons; I’m just letting my mind wander a bit now.)
I don’t know what the “right” price for an e-book is, or if there’s one correct, fixed price point. $6.99 seems reasonable to me, but it’s obvious some people disagree. I’m personally reluctant to buy an e-book for more than $10 … but if the alternative was a $25 hardcover or waiting a year for the paperback, I might go for the e-book.
I know this is an old and ongoing debate. But I wanted to put a few of my thoughts out there as to why “Just make the e-books cheaper!” doesn’t strike me as the answer.
Discussion welcome, as always.
—
Tina Roberts
October 7, 2010 @ 9:53 am
I agree with you completely. I also think that $6.99 is the perfect price point to get my attention for an impulse purchase. I don’t really think that established authors need to go below that although I do like the idea of older works being priced a bit cheaper since fans often already have them and are just buying in a new format. I will occasionally pay more for authors I already read, but new authors aren’t as strongly considered until they drop in price. I say all this owning your three released fairy tale books (LOVE THEM!) as both paperbacks and e-books. I also plan on buying the Goblin books at some point as I am buying the books I like to re-read for my kindle as well. As a consumer who buys a lot of e-books, I recognize that there is a lot of work involved, but I do balk at the same price for an e-book that they want for a paperback.
Jim C. Hines
October 7, 2010 @ 10:02 am
I know what you mean about new authors. It’s one of the reasons I’ve been so happy about DAW putting my books out in mass market. Authors get much better royalties on hardcovers, but how many people are going to pay $25 for some author they’ve never heard of? I’d rather be cheap and easy, and hopefully build an audience that way.
Also, thank you 🙂 So glad you’re enjoying the princess series!
king rat
October 7, 2010 @ 10:07 am
I had somewhat of an economic epiphany the other day to figure out what I’d be willing to pay for an ebook. The one thing I can’t do with most ebooks is sell my copy. So I definitely won’t pay more than the price of the book minus the resale price. Book cost $20 normally and used copies go for $5. I won’t pay more than $15 for the ebook version. Possibly less, since having a physical copy is valuable too, but I haven’t figured out how to value that yet for myself.
Lisa Nohealani Morton
October 7, 2010 @ 10:08 am
The only thing that really gets my back up is when the ebook costs *more* than the physical book does. I prefer ebooks most of the time because they don’t take up bookshelf space (I’ve run out of room for bookshelves in my house) and I can carry several hundred of them on my phone, but not enough to pay $9.99 for something I can get in paperback for $7.99. The end result is usually that I don’t buy that book at all.
This seems to be happening less and less as ebooks become more common and publishers get a handle on what will sell and what won’t, but it’s really frustrating nonetheless.
Ken O'Shaughnessy
October 7, 2010 @ 10:19 am
I do a lot of my reading online (or some offline version thereof) or by ear. My main issue with building up a digital library exclusively, though, is DRM. For example, if I buy a book through Apple (or other vendors), how do I know that I will always have a way to read it, or that they won’t suddenly revoke my access to it? It’s something that some are trying to work out in the marketplace; and then there’s Cory Doctorow 🙂
Margaret Willis
October 7, 2010 @ 10:22 am
I personally have no problem with ebooks being around the same price as paper backs when they are being published by a “traditional” publisher. Unlike so many other people apparently I actually think that the people involved in producing a book from the author to the editor on down should be allowed to make a decent living for what they do. It seems there are a lot of delusional people out there that think that a book is worth nothing more than the raw materials it’s printed on. How sad.
I’m already noticing that there are authors out there who for whatever reason have chosen to publish themselves directly as ebooks and are NOT paying for editors etc. They can certainly make money on a 99cent download because they have nothing tied up in the production of the book but their time, and I sometimes wonder if it’s not that valuable to them.
Unfortunately, so far in my experience the few books I’ve read like this are NOT even worth the 99cents I paid. I’ve quit reading most of them before I was even halfway through because they were just that bad.
I really think that $9.99 is not such a bad price to pay for the hours of entertainment I get from a book.
Mark
October 7, 2010 @ 10:30 am
Possibly because with the physical book those printing & storage costs don’t go away? On the other hand, doesn’t this already happen with the physical book as the book stores discount them and/or kick them over to the reseller market (e.g. Half-Price Books buys book remainders)?
Andrew Betts
October 7, 2010 @ 10:41 am
Being a fairly early adopter to the Kindle (ie not right from the get-go but before the K2 announcement), I’ve liked eBooks priced roughly 20% below paperback cost (or $9.99 whatever was cheaper). Yes this goes for hardcover books as well.
I felt Amazon was fairly decent in their pricing scheme and a lot of craziness started when Apple decided to get into the mix.
The biggest problem I’ve seen is when publishers try to pass off eBooks as being the exact same as a dead-tree book. They’re not for a number of reasons print costs and the ability to lend are the biggest. Certain things are given up when you want to save space (the ability to lend being the biggest here), but when I see eBooks being priced the same price as the paperback or sometimes higher (I’m looking at you “The Hobbit”) I completely pass them by, even in the case of the newest book in one of my favorite series (I’ll get to read “Changes” by Jim Butcher eventually).
The publishers and the sellers are going to keep fighting and in the end it’s the readers and authors that get hit hardest. I’ve sat down and planned out a huge digital initiative for eBooks and while it would be absolutely grand to see something like it implemented the fighting would be too great.
I realized I’ve more or less rambled here, but the point I want say is 15-20% below paperback print is a good price, 10$ for a hardcover is a good price, pushing much beyond that and you begin losing reasons for having eBooks.
Anita K.
October 7, 2010 @ 10:44 am
I think for some people, the thing is that they have spent so much on the e-book reader that they want to feel like they’re recouping the cost and really getting a bargain. At least I know that for me, it would be pretty hard to shell out the money for one, and then spend as much on the books for it as I would anyway. That was a big selling point when e-book readers were first being introduced, that you’d end up saving money (as well as space, etc).
Now, if I somehow won a reader, or was gifted with it or whatever, I think I’d be totally open to paying just a dollar or two less for the e-book than for the dead tree version; I wouldn’t have had to make that up-front big money purchase that scares me. 🙂
Michael Jasper
October 7, 2010 @ 10:50 am
I have a couple novels in which the rights reverted back to me, and I priced the ebook versions at $2.99. That seems to be the sweet spot right now, I think. I see anything over $4 for an ebook and I sorta cringe.
Also, $2.99 is the lowest price you can have for your ebook at Amazon and still get their 70% royalty rate (which is pretty awesome, compare to the paltry royalty rates of print books).
Things are still shaking out, though, on an almost daily basis. The industry will have found the right pricing point soon. Give ’em a year…
Tweets that mention Jim C. Hines » E-book Pricing -- Topsy.com
October 7, 2010 @ 10:59 am
[…] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Stephen Blackmoore, Jim C. Hines. Jim C. Hines said: New Post: E-book Pricing http://bit.ly/aZCboK […]
Jim C. Hines
October 7, 2010 @ 11:09 am
Interesting point. I wouldn’t mind a resale market for used e-books, but I have no clue how to make it happen, technologically speaking…
Jim C. Hines
October 7, 2010 @ 11:09 am
Yeah, I don’t get that one. I can’t think of any reason or justification for the e-book costing more than the physical book…
Jim C. Hines
October 7, 2010 @ 11:10 am
Agreed. I’ve had some issues of my own with DRM, and with losing music I already paid for. I understand the fears behind it, but from everything I’ve seen, it just doesn’t seem to work very well.
Jim C. Hines
October 7, 2010 @ 11:11 am
Does the $4 make you cringe because you feel it’s too much, or because it’s just not what you’re used to?
Jim C. Hines
October 7, 2010 @ 11:16 am
As I understand it, you can download software to read e-books on your computers, and bypass that e-reader cost. It’s not the same, I know. E-readers are nicer on the eyes for that sort of long-term reading, and they’re more portable than some devices. (Though reading on the cell phone works for some poeple.) But I don’t know that recouping the cost is as much of an argument anymore, with prices coming down and alternative reading options becoming more available.
Michael Jasper
October 7, 2010 @ 11:19 am
I actually think it’s a little high — it stops me from making an impulse buy, which is what ebooks are for me now.
And if I enjoy the ebook, I’ll get other books by that author, or even buy the same book in print along with other print versions. Ebooks are great for sampling cheaply.
Tina Roberts
October 7, 2010 @ 11:32 am
I have read the argument about the cost of the e-reader too many times. It doesn’t apply to all. I bought a kindle so that I wouldn’t have to store or haul (my husband actually bought me my first kindle) books around and not because of discounted books. The cost was roughly the same, at least for paperbacks, for what I would pay for a print book on Amazon anyway. The 9.99 for hardcovers was nice, but I don’t tend to buy many books above 7.99. I will just wait until they drop or hit the Bargain Bin at B&N. Now, with the whole Amazon vs the publishers thing, many of the e-books are not discounted at all and I can buy them cheaper as paperbacks. It has made me stop and look at who the publisher of the book is before I buy it. If I get the same dollar off that I would get by buying a physical book it makes me happy and more likely to buy more books by that author/publisher.
Ken Marable
October 7, 2010 @ 11:37 am
Beneath those responses is, I think, the belief that e-books just aren’t worth $6.99. We’re still arguing over the value of an e-book, meaning both how much does it cost to produce, and how much are people willing to pay?
This is a subtle, but very important distinction that I think many people slip up on. Originally, I was annoyed with people that said ebooks should be priced less, because to me, they didn’t have any lower value. As you said, the majority of the costs are all still there whether it is a printed book or ebook (from what I understand printing and physical distribution costs are far from the biggest expense in producing a book). So I was actually offended by people claiming ebooks should cost, say $2.99.
However, I have been reading Joe Konrath’s blog for a while now, and I’ve come around – sort of. My take away from someone like Joe Konrath isn’t that ebooks are just worth less than printed books, but if you look at the hard economics, that currently appears to be a sweet spot for pricing to maximize profit, regardless of whether that’s the proper “value” or whatever.
Selling an ebook for 1/3 of the price makes sense if you can more than triple your sales numbers (especially since ebook revenue scales linearly – it costs the same to the publisher to sell 1 book or 1 million). If you can only double your sales numbers, then of course it’s a bad idea. He has found $2.99 to commonly be that sweet spot to maximize profit. The problem then becomes people who hear that and say “Of course, ebooks are only WORTH $2.99 then!” when the two things have really no relation at all. It’s worth $2.99 to someone who wouldn’t buy it for $3.99. But it’s only worth $1.99 to the person who didn’t buy it because it’s too expensive. Someone willing to pay $15.99 for it, but glad to get the $2.99 deal, doesn’t have any different idea of it’s worth just because she got a good deal.
Once I realized that “worth” is far too subjective to base price on, I became far more comfortable with accepting any price that maximizes profit, whether it is $.99, or $2.99, or $6.99, or $25.99 (although the “.99” thing has annoyed me since I was kid – it’s as dumb as the 9/10 of a cent added to all US gas prices). Whatever price maximizes profit, is the price to have and certainly varies by author and book. I can easily see a trilogy being priced $2, $3, and $4 respectively, or at least the first book in a series being much cheaper than the rest to introduce readers. It has nothing to do with the first book being worth less – it’s just to maximize the money the publisher and author make.
Another thing that helped me switch to the dark side is also the realization that this is an emerging medium. Consumers are still edgy about buying in (including concerns mentioned above about ebooks being revoked as well as DRM, any portability issues, and so on). My hope is that prices are depressed somewhat as consumers are still just starting to accept and grow comfortable with the new medium. That’s just a guess and hope on my part. But that will also play out in higher prices becoming the sweet spot over time rather than pricing them at the high point and trying to drag consumers up to that pricing level. I can’t see that doing anything but slow the acceptance. But I’m no expert, of course.
Big B
October 7, 2010 @ 12:49 pm
What if you had to pay $10 or $15 to go into a room to read the book on a big screen with a bunch of other people eating popcorn, trying to calm crying babies, and distracting you with cell phone light as they text their friend sitting next to them. And you might even miss a few pages if you have to go to the restroom. Then six months later you can buy your own copy of the book $20 or $25, depending on how clear you want the letters to be. Or maybe you could rent it from a vending machine for a dollar a night.
Sean Wallace
October 7, 2010 @ 1:23 pm
I wanna know where you can sell used copies for $5.00 . . . my used bookstore pays $2.00 for a box of books, in contrast to them paying 50 cents to $1.00 for trade-ins . . .
SylviaSybil
October 7, 2010 @ 1:42 pm
“We’re still arguing over the value of an e-book, meaning both how much does it cost to produce, and how much are people willing to pay?”
There’s a very large problem with that, because ebooks inherently have less value. When I buy a paper book, I own that copy of the book. When I buy an ebook, I’m merely renting it.
If I love a paper book, I can loan it to as many friends as I please. If I don’t like a paper book, I can take it to a used book store and get 25% of my money back. I can wrap it up and save myself the cost of a Christmas gift. I can donate it to Goodwill and get a tax write-off.
More subtly; if I change my mind about buying a paper book, I can return it. If there is a problem with constant typos (often caused by conversion software), I can return it. If the formatting gets whacked up, I can exchange it. If I buy a book with 300 blank pages, I can exchange it*. If the bookstore decides to stop selling a book, they do not have the ability to break into my house and take that book off my shelf**.
Ebooks are riskier and less convenient. Buying an ebook is a commitment to a sealed box. Even if publishers realize that and address their consumers’ concerns (excuse me while I die laughing), I’m still stuck with my purchase should I change my mind down the road or should something wallbanger-worthy occur on page 250. Why shouldn’t that risk be reflected in the price point?
* http://dearauthor.com/wordpress/2010/07/06/tuesday-midday-links-july-freebies-and-deals/
** http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/18/technology/companies/18amazon.html
Jim C. Hines
October 7, 2010 @ 1:47 pm
All valid points, and I recognize that this means an e-book has less inherent value to you. However, there are others who might argue that the portability, the ability to adjust font size for ease of reading, the elimination of the need for bookshelves, the ability to read by e-reader, computer, or cellphone, and so on make up for those shortcomings.
I’m not saying I disagree with you, but I don’t think it’s as simple as just saying e-books are inherently less valuable, period.
Jim C. Hines
October 7, 2010 @ 1:48 pm
I can’t speak for other authors, but I know my books are a lot better because of the help I get from my publisher. Everything from my editor helping me to improve the story to all of the work they do to catch and fix my typos and other screw-ups. Bypassing that help would let me sell the books more cheaply, but they wouldn’t be as good.
Anita K.
October 7, 2010 @ 1:52 pm
Yes, I know you can do it on your computer… but for me, that defeats all the benefits of the e-reader (ease, portability, etc.) and I want my phone to make calls and that’s it, because I’m a luddite that way.
True that the costs are coming down but for some of us frugal and woefully under-employed souls, it’s still too much when I can get books from the library for free, or buy discounted/sale/used books much cheaper. 🙁
I don’t know if my observations are representative or anything, just what I’ve noted myself/talking to my group of friends/reading things on Smart Bitches Trashy Books.
King Rat
October 7, 2010 @ 1:53 pm
I regularly got $2 to $7 at Michael’s Books in Bellingham, WA for SF books when I lived up there. Not MMPB though. It’s the only physical location I’ve ever even tried to sell books to. I haven’t actually sold any of my books for a couple of years, so I don’t know what the going rates are.
Jim C. Hines
October 7, 2010 @ 1:58 pm
I don’t know if anyone’s observations are representative of the whole. I’m just trying to absorb the different opinions and ideas while trying to refine my own 🙂
Anita K.
October 7, 2010 @ 2:10 pm
You have some good points. I know that many people in my particular tiny social circle bought into the “save money” hype, and they would have to buy a whoooole lot of books to recoup that initial cost. For me, if I had the money, I would be paying that initial cost to have ease, portability, etc; I would not be trying to recoup the cost in book savings. 🙂
Steven Saus
October 7, 2010 @ 2:25 pm
Ken, the DRM is circumventable using your own keys from the software – at least from Adobe (including Sony), Barnes & Noble, and Amazon. The hardest parts of circumventing the DRM are finding the scripts (not hard) and installing Python (also not hard).
Because it’s so easy to get around the DRM, I suspect that the DRM will eventually end up going away.
Steven Saus
October 7, 2010 @ 2:27 pm
Anita – I know someone who used a netbook turned on its side for the longest time as an eReader (and web browser, etc). Tablets are also viable options.
Laptops & desktops? Meh.
Just saying that if you’re in the market for a netbook or tablet, there isn’t much of a need to buy a separate reader.
Tina Roberts
October 7, 2010 @ 2:32 pm
I have many friends that must be more cost conscious so I do understand that mentality! In fact, several of them are now leaping in with the wifi kindle because it is has crossed the threshold from “wish list” to “if I eat mac-n-cheese this month” 🙂 Another consequence of the kindle and books being expensive is that friends are buying kindles on one persons account so that they can all share the books. That is potentially a lot of lost revenue right there. I just want things to settle in so I don’t have to spend as much time figuring out how to maximize my own interests!
Steven Saus
October 7, 2010 @ 2:42 pm
Jim, I’ve gotta wonder what the cost of a book is when broken down. I’ve priced some freelance editors (copy and line), and also priced graphic artists for cover art. I know what I charge for eBook layout. That’s still not a whole ton of money.
I essentially say a version of what Ken does in today’s blog entry (I say additional things here, so they’re both worth reading, IMHO). However… there’s two bits that get ignored, one of which Jim hit on. While “cheaper” does not automatically mean “valued less”, there is a point where lower prices is equated with lower value in a consumer’s mind.
Second, remember that demand is not infinitely elastic. I wasn’t saying Jim should lower the price of his new books – I was saying that he probably could have moved more copies (and everyone still made a profit). But that only works until demand ends. Realistically, we’re looking at something like this equation (if I did this right):
X = (Y + (Z * 0-C)) * C
X = money needed to pay all contributors
Y = number of people who want the book at all
Z = number of people who are turned off by price increases
C = cost of book
So as C goes above $0.00, the number of people buying the book goes down but the income from the book goes up. It’s complex enough as a linear function, but probably isn’t. And worse, we only really know X. We can set C, but both Y and Z are guesses.
What this equation tells us, though, is that when (Y * C) < X, it doesn’t matter how much cheaper you go. There’s a limit to how much demand can expand, and we’ll be well served to keep aware of that.
Lorien
October 7, 2010 @ 2:42 pm
Disclosure – I work for B&N and I am Digital Lead (in charge of NOOK) at my store.
In my experience ebooks are generally about half of the hardcover price. If a book is out in mass market paperback, the ebook is usually the same price or a few dollars cheaper. I have only had a few people say that this kind of pricing is unreasonable. Usually I refer them to Charlie Stross’ CMAP to gain some understanding of the publishing process and how many people it takes to produce a book worth reading. My value of ebooks is related to space, portability and the environment. My nook has more books on it than my four bookshelves do, and weighs less than a hardcover.
Most people don’t know how bookstores process returns to the publisher for books not sold. I think the majority would be appalled. The publisher usually ships us more books than we can sell. The store hangs on to them for 60-90 days and then we ship them back, wasting time, gas and money. Three months later we will get that $25-30 hardcover back as a bargain book for $5-10. Sometimes we skip this process with a “publisher shared markdown” which discounts the book 50% and then eventually takes it down to bargain price without doing all the shipping back and forth. I hope to see this be the norm in the future. You probably don’t even want to know what we do with paperback books. The first time I did it I wanted to cry. We rip the front cover off and only send that back to the publisher. The rest of the book goes to be pulped. After almost 10 years of working at a bookstore this incredible waste still hurts me. With ebooks there are no returns, no waste.
Russ
October 7, 2010 @ 2:47 pm
Salon recently ran an article saying that ebooks should be $4. Like you, I’m not sure of the price point.
Salon: http://www.salon.com/technology/dan_gillmor/2010/10/06/insane_ebook_pricing/index.html
Reddit Comment Thread: http://www.reddit.com/r/books/comments/dnsfk/ebooks_should_cost_four_dollars/
The main issue for me is that if I buy a ebook for my iPad (I like the kindle app), I have to give the iPad to my wife so she can read it. And then the elder daughter (all three of us enjoy your books). There’s no “lending” – I couldn’t put the ebook on her ipod or the kids’ kindle. Resell is also an issue but mainly it’s the lending.
The Salon article mentions that Amazon went out of its way to sell ebooks as a loss leader, and get users “used” to paying ten bucks for an ebook, which price sets how much the authors make and indirectly improves Amazon’s bottom line (next year). Actually, I think that’s wrong on Amazon’s part, but it’s interesting that a large company like that is willing to shove prices down.
I’m not sure 4 bucks is a great price point, but ebooks *are* inherently worth less to me.The stuff you cit: portability, ability to adjust font size, elimination of bookshelves .. to me, that should be part of the reader (the kindle or the nook or the app) not the book, and shouldn’t be part of the value of the book. Potatoes don’t cost more just because you can shoot them from potato cannons as well as eat them in chowder.
Jim C. Hines
October 7, 2010 @ 3:29 pm
Wait, you’re a bookseller? Why don’t you come over here and sit in the nice comfy chair. Can I get you anything? 🙂
I know what you mean about the pain of stripped books. I knew about that process before I got published, so I was braced for it, but it still hurts to think about all of those books getting destroyed. As for the hardcovers bouncing back and forth on their way to the bargain bin … sigh.
Possibly a dumb question, but what is Charlie’s CMAP that you mentioned?
SylviaSybil
October 7, 2010 @ 4:26 pm
It’s true that many people prefer ebooks for those reasons and more. Instant gratification is one I see cited often.
But even letting lendability etc. balance out portability etc., there’s still a loss from a purely financial viewpoint. Let’s assume that eventually publishers realize that selling blank, misformatted and misconverted ebooks is Bad and work out a system where readers can exchange faulty ebooks for ones with quality comparable to paper. Even in this ideal world, paper has more value. When I buy paper, I have something that can be resold to recoup my financial loss, in part or in whole. When I buy electronic, there’s no way to get money back out of it.
Steven Saus
October 7, 2010 @ 4:29 pm
Common Misconceptions About Publishing. The series starts here.
Anita K.
October 7, 2010 @ 4:31 pm
I just want to thank you for your description of the stripping process. I remember asking my father, a librarian, about it (because of those little disclaimers in the front of books about not buying without a cover) when I was about 6, and he told me it was too horrible to tell me until I was older. When I was older and asked, I’m pretty sure he cried describing it. Good memories. 🙂
Jim C. Hines
October 8, 2010 @ 9:49 am
Ah. Thanks, Steven!
Sam Jeude
October 10, 2010 @ 4:19 pm
Then there’s folks like me. I’ve had 3 strokes; holding a paperback is difficult (at best;at worst I drop it, & lose my place totally). & hardcovers? Don’t make laugh, they’re impossibly heavy. My e-books are the same light weight, & for the most part, if I drop it, no biggie; it’s still on the same page. Plus I can read *anywhere*! (yes, i’ve got an iPad). For me, the e-book has become a necessity; I was running out of storage room (& I do mean running out, as in except for the John, we’ve got bookcases in all rooms & in a 1200 sq. ft. house there’s only so much space for double-stacked books). I miss out on a few books (sorry, Sharon Lee/Steve Miller), but at least now I can *read* again!
Deirdre Saoirse Moen
October 10, 2010 @ 4:56 pm
Disclosure: my employer is an e-book purveyor, but I do not work in a capacity directly related to that.
For a long time, I thought e-books should be price less than physical books.
I’m no longer feeling that at all. Well, except for hardcover prices, which have been painful for years.
Someone asked why I preferred e-books, and somehow in there I managed to calculate how much physical bookcases cost per year of storage. We live in a house with enormous rent, and each bookcase costs us $217 in floor space per year. We have eleven of them. This doesn’t include the cost of the space needed to get *to* the bookcase, either.
So — $2387 a year for what, exactly? The privilege of dusting them?
With e-books, I can have hundreds of books at my fingertips. The ongoing maintenance cost is negligible (I could afford a new laptop per year just in space savings alone — if the house got smaller, that is). With e-books, I can find any book without wandering through the house like a wight.
Rick and I were married for eight years before we finally merged and de-duped our book collection. We wouldn’t have needed to bother had we had e-books.
My new policy, given our burgeoning bookshelves, is that anything available in an e-book format will be bought in an e-book format. So far this year, that’s 34 books. For contrast, I’ve bought seven paper books this year. Two from Kepler’s, two were textbooks, and three books I bought in New Zealand that were specific to that location (one a bilingual book of Maori songs).
The only downside to e-books? DRM. I’d pay less for DRMed books than for non-DRMed books. EPUB is an open format, and I don’t forsee that anything will render it unreadable in the next millenia save for a total technological meltdown.
@Sam Jeude: webscriptions.net does carry some Sharon Lee books. They have some great deals, too.
@Jim: thankfully, now that there are downloadable previews of books by new (or new to me) authors, I’ve given some first authors chances at prices greater than mass market.