Pseudonyms: A Chat with “Benjamin Tate”
Each year, Brenda Novak runs an auction to raise money for diabetes research. Last year, she raised more than a quarter of a million dollars. Among the items and services up for bid are a short story/chapter critique by yours truly, as well as an autographed copy of The Stepsister Scheme.
#
Jon Gibbs recently interviewed Jig the goblin for the Find a Writing Group blog. The interview is posted here. I enjoy this sort of thing, and it was fun to get into Jig’s voice again.
#
Benjamin Tate‘s new book Well of Sorrows [B&N | Mysterious Galaxy | Amazon] is out this week from DAW. My investigative goblins have discovered that Mr. Tate is in fact a pseudonym for another fantasy author.
Pseudonyms are common practice. Sometimes an author will use them to write in different genres — someone who wants to write YA and erotica both, for example. Other times it’s a way to reboot a career. I shot Mr. Tate a few questions about his choice to adopt a new identity.
1. Why did you (or your editor) decide to release this book under a pseudonym?
The decision came from the marketing department, according to my editor. The problem is how the chain bookstores order the books that they put on the shelves. What they do (in general) is look up the author and see how many of the previous books by that author sold in their store, and then base their order on those sales. This is unfortunate, especially for a series, because while the third book of the past series may not have sold well, the start of a new series might find a different audience and do very well . . . but only if those books are available in the bookstore for the customers to notice and pick up.
Since WELL OF SORROWS is the start of a new series, it was decided that in order to get more books on the shelf, a pseudonym would be the way to go. My editor talked to me about this for quite a while, to make certain I was OK with it, before we went forward.
2. What was your reaction to the idea? How do you feel about it now?
My initial reaction was despair. I realized pseudonyms are a fairly common practice in the industry, but I think everyone (after reaching that first huge hurdle of breaking in) pretty much assumes their novel will become an instant bestseller and they will have legions of adoring fans. I know I thought that. How could someone NOT love my novels? So I deluded myself into believing that the whole pseudonym thing wouldn’t be an issue for ME.
Then the first book hit the shelf, and while it wasn’t an instant bestseller, it wasn’t a complete bomb either. By the time the third book hit the shelf with the same sales record (not great, but not bad either) I started getting the niggling feeling that I should be looking at the pseudonym. But I still didn’t want to accept that outcome. So when my editor brought it up, my heart fell . . . even though I sort of knew it might be coming and was relatively prepared. (I’d picked out a name by then, for example.)
At this point, I’ve gone through all of the stages of grief and I’ve come to accept the name change. While I would have loved to have been published only under one name, I’m much more interested in just remaining published. I’m looking forward to trying to build a new and larger audience with Benjamin Tate, and I’m even having some fun with my old and new persona online. I’ve accepted that it’s part of the business, and that it isn’t personal in any way. It’s simply a strategy to help develop and newer and broader audience for my books.
But it still sucks.
3. In a way, you’re getting a second chance to be a brand new author. What are you doing differently this time?
I’ve learned a few things with the previous book releases. As far as writing goes, nothing much has changed. I’m not trying to write in a different way or changing what it is that I write. I love fantasy, all of my ideas are fantasy-related, and I’m not trying to bend them to fit what’s currently “hot” or anything like that. The only things that I’ve changed relate to the promotion of my books. I’m trying to do more online (such as this interview) in order to get the word out to the largest possible audience as cheaply as possible. I’ve cut back on other things, mostly experiments in promotion that I tried and I’ve decided aren’t worth the effort or the cost.
One major thing is that I’ve set aside LESS time for promotion, since I feel it’s more effective to simply work on the next novel and make progress there instead. Most of what I tried regarding the previous books just didn’t have that great an effect on increasing my audience or those who knew about the books. So I’ve put my time into a better online presence (Ben Tate has a Facebook fan page, a blog at LiveJournal, a more professional webpage, is doing more interviews and such), and cut back on less effective promotional tools (such as postcards, magnets, conventions, etc). I’m still using most of those tools; I’m simply not putting as much energy into them as I did for the first books.
4. You’re still out there as . . . let’s call your secret identity Joseph Palmator. How much work is it to manage both careers? How do you balance everything?
Balancing the two presences isn’t as bad as I thought. I’m still active at the same levels online and in person, except now when I have an idea I ask myself whether it’s something that would benefit Benjamin Tate more, or . . . my other identity. Since Ben has the newest book, almost everything I’m doing related to writing or publishing has been under his name. Everything else has been kept under . . . Joseph’s name. And I’m having some fun playing the two for and against each other as well. I’ve saved some time by hiring someone to do Ben’s webpage, for example. So far, I’ve been able to manage both presences without too much additional work on my part. I’ve found that nearly everything comes down to organization. I’ve kept Ben as a separate identity, but I’ve made his life very similar to his predecessor, which helps keep things organized.
5. Any final thoughts?
I guess the only thing I’d like to add is that there are levels to each pseudonym used. Sometimes, the fact that a particular name is a pseudonym is to be kept completely secret, and other times it’s completely open. I’m treating Benjamin Tate as an open secret: I’m not making any huge announcements about who he REALLY is, but I’m not actively trying to hide it either. I was told by my editor that revealing it isn’t an issue; in fact, she said I could announce to the world who Ben Tate really is once the book hit the shelves. But I’m having too much fun with it at the moment, so I’ve put off the announcement.
In the end, it doesn’t matter why a pseudonym was used for a book–whether it was a change in genre for the author, an attempt to skirt sales numbers, an attempt to skirt the Ordering Computer at a chain store, whatever–the use of a pseudonym all comes down to finding the best way to market a book so it reaches the largest audience.
Thanks, Ben! And best of luck with Well of Sorrows [B&N | Mysterious Galaxy | Amazon]! (A summary of the book is available on Tate’s web site.)
Cy
May 6, 2010 @ 12:33 pm
Ooh, very interesting. I knew authors used pseudonyms sometimes if they wrote different genres, but I didn’t realize that it could also be used to get around a bookstore chain’s Ordering Bot. Now that you say it, it makes a lot of sense–their buyers probably wouldn’t have time to sample/hear about every new book published, so they’d probably just focus on promising first-time authors and use sales history to determine the others.
I’ve thought about using a pen name (from the get-go) because I don’t have a very marketable name. But at the same time, I want to be able to show people I know my books and say, “see? I’m published!” That’s probably kind of childish, but it would feel good seeing my name on a real book cover. On the other hand, I don’t want to scare off potential readers because they’d make assumptions about the book based on my not-exactly-mainstream name… Guess that’s an issue I’d have to talk to my editor about (when I finally get one, that is–lol~).
Thanks for the interesting post!
D. Moonfire
May 6, 2010 @ 1:05 pm
Pseudonames are fun and difficult, at least from my experience. It is interesting how it changes the public’s perceptions of the writer, allowing for a “new start” but also to just experiment without alienating the other fans.
Very cool interview. Thank you.
Jim C. Hines
May 6, 2010 @ 1:48 pm
Childish or not, I totally understand 🙂 Maybe it’s egotistical, but I like being able to see *my* name on a book. Or to have my kids be able to see their last name on my books. It’s an awesome feeling! Not that I’d be unwilling to go the pseudonym route if I had to, but I definitely prefer using my own name.
I know several authors who have adopted pseudonyms because their real names aren’t “reader-friendly”. They worry readers wouldn’t know how to pronounce them and ask for the books in stores, or that spelling trouble would make it harder to find them online, and so on. I don’t know how much of an impact that would have, but I can see where it’s worth thinking about.
Jim C. Hines
May 6, 2010 @ 2:06 pm
Makes me think about authors who used pseudonyms for other reasons, such as gender. Tiptree is the first one that comes to mind. Heck, even choosing which version of your name to use can affect public perception. J. K. Rowling, for example…
D. Moonfire
May 6, 2010 @ 3:13 pm
I completely agree. My pseudonyms is specific to the genre I write in. And it works well for me. But, it is a fair amount of work to maintain a pseudonyms since you can’t exactly go into stores offering to sign stock and you have to use the Internet as a “shield” to prevent breaking that separation.
Obviously, if you have an open secret pseudonym, it is less of an issue, but I keep my relatively separate.
And, to your above comment, it is a bummer that you *don’t* see your name on the book. It is frustrating actually, because keeping that separation of pseudonyms mean you can’t really talk about it, or be that proud. It always feels frustrating when I say “I got a book published… but I can’t talk about it.”
Stephen Watkins
May 11, 2010 @ 10:17 am
This is a question I’ve struggled with, myself… though not one I have to settle with any certainty any time soon. Myself, I just have such a very common name. Right now, if you google my name, while my blog comes up near the top of the list of hits, you’ll also find references to tons of other Stephen and Steve Watkinses… including one Steve Watkins who’s already a published author (albeit not in fantasy/speculative fiction).
Because of that, I’m already prepared with a potential pseudonym as well, but I kind of figure I’ll play it fairly open, by exposing the reality of my pseudonym as a pure marketing/branding scheme from the get-go, if it comes to that. I’m too proud of my real name, common though it is, not to keep using it in some way.
Passion for Writing: May 20th, 2010 | Moses and Dionysus Walk Into a Bar ...
May 20, 2010 @ 4:12 pm
[…] C Hines’ blog, there’s an interview with a mysterious fantasy author who has decided to use a pseudonym. He talks about his decision to do so. […]
Moses Siregar III
May 20, 2010 @ 10:26 pm
Thanks for this, Jim. You probably saw this already, but I mentioned your interview on my blog today.
Barb
May 21, 2010 @ 4:06 am
I use a pen-name or pseudonym because my real family name is in the unpronouncable/unspellable category even for my mother tongue (Italian – it contains a “grammar mistake”. And I’m not that fond of it that I want to see it on a book cover. I picked up the pseudonym years ago, even if I’m still unpublished. I’ve written some articles (in Italian) under my real name, but I keep the “journalist” very separate from the “writer” (I’m a writer, I don’t like being a journalist, so I quit doing it – never was may “dayjob” anyway! ;-)).
Thanks for the great interview, will have to check some books (my wishlist is neverending, sigh! :-()
Jim C. Hines
May 21, 2010 @ 7:42 am
I did, and thank you!
Jim C. Hines
May 21, 2010 @ 7:43 am
Barb,
I know at least two other SF/F writers who chose to use pseudonyms for exactly that reason.
Glad you enjoyed the interview!
New York Times writers on writing series – Susan Richards Shreve « creative barbwire (or the many lives of a creator)
May 26, 2010 @ 3:04 am
[…] comfort in a cloak of anonymity” in the aforementioned s. This also relates (sort of) to the post on Jim C.Hines’s blog, interview with an author who used a pseudonym. So pseudonym (or […]
Go Big or Go Home? « The Undiscovered Author
June 2, 2010 @ 8:09 am
[…] […]